Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sun Jan 18, 2026 9:48 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2025 2:11 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:02 am
Posts: 3274
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
First name: Barry
Last Name: Daniels
I prefer the tone from traditionally braced guitar tops that are under the full stress from string tension.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2025 2:14 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2025 6:43 pm
Posts: 12
Location: Whatcom Co, Washington
First name: Breanna
Last Name: Anderson
City: Deming
State: WA
Zip/Postal Code: 98244
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Currently I'm in a slow process of building a few new instruments using my system. Both will be OM profile bodies with 3.5 degree angled neck with a target saddle height of about 25-27mm. First instrument I plan to do a 2mm median soundboard thickness (maybe tapered to the edge) with very light lateral /parabolic bracing just to achieve more isotropic stiffness of the soundboard. They will feature composite force compensators aiming for lowest possible mass. I'll check back in when I have some results.

_________________
Breanna Anderson
https://glyphstone.studio



These users thanked the author glyphstone for the post: Durero (Tue Dec 02, 2025 11:20 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2025 10:48 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 3965
Location: United States
Why such a tall saddle if you are not using it to produce a break over angle and down force on the top?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2025 7:59 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2025 6:43 pm
Posts: 12
Location: Whatcom Co, Washington
First name: Breanna
Last Name: Anderson
City: Deming
State: WA
Zip/Postal Code: 98244
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I am. The high bridge produces increased acoustic forces on the soundboard.

_________________
Breanna Anderson
https://glyphstone.studio


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2025 10:02 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 3965
Location: United States
glyphstone:
I found your answer a bit ambiguous. I asked:
"Why such a tall saddle if you are not using it to produce a break over angle and down force on the top?"

And you replied:
"I am".

Are you using the tall bridge to produce a downward break angle at the bridge? My impression was you were trying to eliminate those static forces.

You added:
"The high bridge produces increased acoustic forces on the soundboard."

In a post I made in this thread on Nov. 18 I mentioned an experiment I did on the effect of varying the string height off the top and the break angle on a standard Classical guitar. Basically: so long as the string remains in contact with the saddle top throughout it's entire vibration cycle all of the signal, the 'acoustic force', is transmitted to the top. The only function of the break angle is to keep the string from hopping off the saddle or rolling or sliding sideways.

In my experiment I used a mechanical 'plucker' to impart a known force at a given location in a vertical direction relative to the plane of the soundboard. In that case, with no sideways forces, six degrees of break angle worked fine. Increasing it to ~25 degrees made no audible or measurable difference. Raising the string height off the top increased the relative strength of the twice-per-cycle 'tension' signal (the second and fourth partials). It also increased the relative strength of the longitudinal 'zip' tone. However, neither of these increased the total output of the string, neither the amplitude nor the duration of the tone was changed. After all, the amount of energy being fed into the string was the same every time: an increase at one frequency seems to have been balanced by a small decrease everywhere else.

Break angle at the saddle doesn't need to be down or up. Pianos run the string over a saddle with a pin (or more than one) between it and the hitch pins. The string is bent slightly sideways to keep it in position, but there is a down force. Resophonic guitars often use a tight notch in the the saddle to capture the string so it won't move up and down.

I'm imagining a bridge set up so that it essentially 'floats' freely, with it's base exactly at the plane of the top. The bridge is then glued to the top to transmit the 'up and down' forces. Those are by far the strongest sound producers. Besides, if you've eliminated the 'torque' and 'transverse' forces on the saddle, what else is left? ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2025 3:32 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2025 6:43 pm
Posts: 12
Location: Whatcom Co, Washington
First name: Breanna
Last Name: Anderson
City: Deming
State: WA
Zip/Postal Code: 98244
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
You say you did your experiment on a "standard Classical guitar", so I assume the strings are tied off at the bridge. If that is the case then indeed the break angle simply has the function of keeping good contact between the string and saddle. In my design, the bridge is usually a floating bridge but the main point is that strings are terminated at the tailpiece so the downward force of the break angle is applied directly to the soundboard, it's not just a force triangle within the structure of the bridge/saddle construction itself. In my design, the increased static and acoustic transverse forces are applied to the top/soundboard but the complementary break angle of the cables and force compensators within the guitar cancel out the increased static transverse constant force of about 38 lbs force. The high break angle does provide for efficient transfer of acoustic transverse forces into the soundboard. The compliance (low spring factor) of the internal force compensators allow for good soundboard movement which is how I can achieve a very high monopole mobility.

_________________
Breanna Anderson
https://glyphstone.studio


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], jfrench and 119 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com