Official Luthiers Forum!
http://luthiersforum.com/forum/

Maple Parlor - Maple back braces?
http://luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10101&t=37352
Page 1 of 1

Author:  NWflyonly [ Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Maple Parlor - Maple back braces?

Anyone use maple braces for their maple guitar backs? Any problem with that?

Sent from my Droid

Author:  douglas ingram [ Sat Aug 04, 2012 7:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Maple Parlor - Maple back braces?

You could, but why would you? So heavy...

Author:  NWflyonly [ Sat Aug 04, 2012 9:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Maple Parlor - Maple back braces?

I get the weight issue but it's a maple parlor and the back braces are pretty small and I don't think it would be all that noticeable. Thanks for the input I really appreciate it. I'll see what moves me in the morning...or err well I'll decide in the morning. It's generally bran cereal that...well you know what I mean.

Author:  Shaw [ Sat Aug 04, 2012 9:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Maple Parlor - Maple back braces?

I figure if a parlor guitar with maple braces is to heavy for someone they should take up another hobby. It won't add that much weight.

Author:  Alexandru Marian [ Sun Aug 05, 2012 6:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Maple Parlor - Maple back braces?

On classicals mahogany is often used for back braces, and its the same weight range as maple.

Author:  ernie [ Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Maple Parlor - Maple back braces?

We have a local maple here called silver maple which has abt the same density as h. mahog abt .47. Soft eastern maple is abt the same .But from what I/ve seen of euro maple e.g. norway and others, density is slightly higher. I used soft maple on a recent baritone uke back .of walnut .I just used thin 6.5mm or 1/4in back bracing.

Author:  grumpy [ Sun Aug 05, 2012 10:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Maple Parlor - Maple back braces?

I've used white birch(a bit lighter than most maples, but not by much) on mahogany backs(dreads) at times, when after a specific response. It works very well, the weight added is minimal, and it looks rather "normal"(IE: nobody notices unless I point them out). Don't have exact specs with me, but they would have been 1/4", or slightly less, wide; normal height.

Go for it!

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/