Official Luthiers Forum! http://luthiersforum.com/forum/ |
|
My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! http://luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10101&t=38223 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Mike Baker [ Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
Hey, all . I have been working on a stage acoustic I'm calling my Faux Acoustic. I recieved swome interest here and in the electric forum for pics when it is completed, so for those of you interested, I will post pics here as well as a link to this thread in the electric forum. Without further ado: |
Author: | Mike Baker [ Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
Author: | Mike Baker [ Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
Sound clip. https://www.box.com/s/7jbddw1ttcprkm2zl971 |
Author: | meddlingfool [ Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
The Fauxcoustic! |
Author: | Parser [ Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
Interesting - does it have an under saddle pickup? |
Author: | nyazzip [ Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
it actually sounds quite convincing.....details please? pickup type/chambered? |
Author: | Chris Pile [ Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
OK, I listened and am reasonably impressed. Details of the build now, or you'll be sorry! ![]() |
Author: | Mike Baker [ Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
Thanks for the interest, all. It's a braced spruce top... ....with a fully chambered white ash body. Pickup and electronics are the Schatten SBT and Fishman Powerjack endpin pre. I wanted a stage acoustic that sounded good through an amp or PA, and as simple as I could make it. |
Author: | klooker [ Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
Very cool, simple & elegant. ![]() ![]() ![]() Kevin Looker |
Author: | Chris Pile [ Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
I like it. I will add one to my "build it" list.... |
Author: | nyazzip [ Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
was the top as thin as a "real" flat top.....? |
Author: | Mike Baker [ Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
nyazzip wrote: was the top as thin as a "real" flat top.....? That's hard to say, isn't it? I don't think there's a standard, is there? That said, I thinned it to .118", which is probably a little thicker than most. This is the first acoustic type instrument I've ever done, so I opted for what I thought was a little thicker top with braces thinned as much as I dared. Assuming top thickness is relative to body size, the body is an L-00. |
Author: | Lincoln Goertzen [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 12:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
Great job, Mike! I have to ask- does it seem as though the bridge is about an inch farther north than looks "right" on an acoustic body? I'm sure you have a really good reason for this, it just looks slightly out of place to my eyes. Not to be critical, just wondering. |
Author: | David Murray [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
Lincoln Goertzen wrote: Great job, Mike! I have to ask- does it seem as though the bridge is about an inch farther north than looks "right" on an acoustic body? I'm sure you have a really good reason for this, it just looks slightly out of place to my eyes. Not to be critical, just wondering. I have built one similar to this, and originally designed it, like this one, to be 16 frets to the body. More neck outside of the body = a shorter space from the neck joint to the bridge. In order to even out the look, I shortened the upper bout a bit. I chickened out though, and ended up making it 14 frets to the body. Congrats Mike! |
Author: | Mike Baker [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 12:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
Lincoln Goertzen wrote: Great job, Mike! I have to ask- does it seem as though the bridge is about an inch farther north than looks "right" on an acoustic body? I'm sure you have a really good reason for this, it just looks slightly out of place to my eyes. Not to be critical, just wondering. Not to worry. Yeah, the look is a little different, but I like it quite a bit, and most people who've see it like the look as well. The reason I built it that way was to have the neck joined at the 16th, like many electric guitars. This guitar was designed as a sort of crossover between the two. I have some physical problems that cause issues when I try to play a standard depth acoustic. Even a small one. So I was looking to combine the comfort of a thinner electric body and a decent acoustic sound through an amp. I also enjoy playing lead when I can, so another consideration was easier access to higher frets. I didn't alter the body to compensate because I wanted as much "belly" vibrating behind the bridge as I could get. Who knows? It might catch on. I bet when the 14 fret dred was introduced a lot of folk who played 12 fretters said similar("Wow, that looks strange"). In fact, there's still a bit of bias/opinionated preference between lovers of each type. Any time there's a change in what we percieve as "normal", it kind of looks strange to our eyes. I don't see it as any more that that. And I don't have a problem being a little "strange". |
Author: | nyazzip [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 12:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
Quote: I have some physical problems that cause issues when I try to play a standard depth acoustic. Even a small one. ....and would that physical issue be known in Western medicine as beergutius giganticus? i, too, suffer from that ![]() |
Author: | Mike Baker [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
nyazzip wrote: Quote: I have some physical problems that cause issues when I try to play a standard depth acoustic. Even a small one. ....and would that physical issue be known in Western medicine as beergutius giganticus? i, too, suffer from that ![]() LOL! No, but my potatogutius giganticus probably doesn't help any. ![]() |
Author: | Lincoln Goertzen [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
Thanks, Mike. I figured it was a geometry thing. I don't think it looks bad at all, just different, like you say. Different is good, when done well, like yours. ![]() |
Author: | WudWerkr [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
I Love it , Simple Elegance ! Beautifull work and sound ! ![]() |
Author: | Mike Baker [ Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
Lincoln, Wud, thanks so much. Wud, I like your avatar. I think I can relate. ![]() |
Author: | Mike Baker [ Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
I thought about it for a while, played around with that back panel, moving it around to see what various sized openings did to the tone, and decided I'd try a sound port/sound hole. Here's how she looks now. I also did some more work on the bracing through the back panel access, thinning the tone bars down some more. I think it sounds pretty good acoustically now. It's not a cannon, and definitely doesn't have the low end boom of a good dread, but it's volume is loud enough that it holds it's own with other acoustic guitars, and it's tone, which is pretty balanced with more of a midrange sound, cuts through well. It's definitely not got the richness of a true full bodied acoustic, and I think the bracing probably has a lot to do with that as well, but it is pleasing to the ears, IMO. It is what it is, and I'm happy with that, all those considerations included. I will post a soundclip hopefully some time tommorrow evening, for those of you who might be interested. It remains to be seen how the soundports will affect feedback through an amp, but since I play in church and am not close to cranking it anyway I've experienced no issues as of yet. |
Author: | Mark Groza [ Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
Looks nice! I like the Ash body ![]() |
Author: | Mike Baker [ Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
Thanks, Mark. I like the ash as well. I think the grain is quite lovely, and I love working with it. The white ash that I use can be quite heavy, but for an application like this one, that's not a problem. |
Author: | Robbie_McD [ Sat Nov 24, 2012 7:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
That is really sweet! Innovative too! Like how the headstock and cutaway shapes are complimentary. Well done! Rob |
Author: | Mike Baker [ Sat Nov 24, 2012 7:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My Faux Acoustic is finished! Pics inside! |
Thaks, Rob! |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |