Official Luthiers Forum! http://luthiersforum.com/forum/ |
|
best option for amplifying nylon string guitars http://luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10101&t=41494 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | nyazzip [ Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
so a buddy and i might start playing some open mics/coffee houses this winter, for giggles. i was wondering what the options are as far as pickups/internal mics, for classicals, so i could plug right in to a mixer? i don't mind doing a little surgery, but i don't want to have to remove a bridge. i'd like the guitar to retain it's nylon string sound qualities(unlike the steel string soundhole pickups, which i think are awful). external miking is out of the question, too complicated and restrictive..... any recommendations? |
Author: | fingerstyle1978 [ Wed Sep 25, 2013 2:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
You can always used a UST, but I personally don't like them. I'd think that the MiniFlex 2 mike system (with the option to add a third source) would be among the best options, but I don't deal much with classicals. I did install the system into a SS baritone though and I was very pleased with the sound straight out of the amp after making some adjustments of mic position. I don't know how well the anthem would work but that is another favorite of mine as a player. |
Author: | DannyV [ Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
These http://www.kksound.com/products/pureclassic.php work well but all the best players I've seem used mics. |
Author: | Chris Pile [ Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
I installed many a Mini-Flex system as alternatives to under the saddle pickups. They are totally unobtrusive for the user, easy to install, and personally I think a microphone will always sound better than a pickup on a string instrument. |
Author: | Jim Watts [ Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
K&K's work well and are an easy install. |
Author: | nyazzip [ Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
the K&K options look less expensive than Mini Flex...sure are a bunch of choices with K&K. i guess i should give a dealer a call to figure out what i really want/need, as in: onboard preamps recommended? EQ necessary? etc thanks |
Author: | the Padma [ Wed Sep 25, 2013 6:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
Best option for amplifying nylon? ....well there be only 2 choices 1. microphonic or 2. piezoelectric Dozens of manufactures pushing their particular product persuasion. Take your pic. |
Author: | SteveSmith [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
nyazzip wrote: the K&K options look less expensive than Mini Flex...sure are a bunch of choices with K&K. i guess i should give a dealer a call to figure out what i really want/need, as in: onboard preamps recommended? EQ necessary? etc thanks I won't debate that one of the microphone type pickups may provide the best fidelity. I play steel string but I have heard the K&K on nylon string, it sounds very nice and is quite cost-effective. It's easy to install and remove, the only change to the guitar is to enlarge the end pin hole for the jack; if you don't want to change the guitar they also have a Vintage Jack that fits in a standard end-pin hole. I'm not a fan of on-board preamps. For stage use I like the XLR Pure Preamp; I've been using one for about 3 years. Provides an XLR output for the board and will run on phantom power if it's available. There's also a 1/4" output and it can run on a 9V battery. Controls are volume, gain, treble, mid, bass, and a phase switch. |
Author: | SteveSmith [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
Todd Stock wrote: ...it is a miserable pickup for an overbuilt, heavy, unresponsive guitar, so I don't even consider installing it in most mass market or less responsive custom built stuff. A good point and I should have noted that. Another thing I forgot to mention is that the K&K will capture everything that happens on the soundboard, if you have a tendency to scrape or tap your nails it will pick it up. I used to do that myself until I started using one but it was easy to break the habit. |
Author: | DannyV [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
Todd Stock wrote: I've installed a dozen different types of systems on nylon string and classical guitars, including system not intended for nylon string installation...all worked well enough, but there are pros and cons for each. For hybrids and production classicals, I think the DTAR Multisource or the LR Baggs Anthem SL Classical are the best of the options...both use a very good, ribbon UST, a tailored preamp system which is tuned to nylon string output, and are not too difficult to install if you can take a few rare earth magnets and the time to lay out the bracing pattern near the bridge. http://www.amazon.com/D-TAR-Multi-Sourc ... B00301ZJKM http://www.fullcompass.com/product/452064.html?utm_source=googleps&utm_medium=shopping&utm_campaign=googleps&gclid=CLWCrIyU6bkCFQyk4Aodd3IA1w The DTAR is somewhat less sensitive to the voltage drop in use, and their old 18V systems were even more so, but I don't think it's a particularly onerous task to check battery voltage before a gig. The ability to blend mic into the UST or vice versa is the key here - mics are great...right up until it's an outdoors venue with a lot of noise, or you play with a drummer or bass player, or the house system is feeding back at output levels well below that needed for decent sound. Having the ability to blend in or switch to UST adds a lot of flexibility to the system at the cost of an extra $100 and a half hour of install time. The bridge mods are pretty easy for ribbon UST's - layout, drill 45 degree angled holes to clear the wings and fans, and trim the saddle. If the slight gap at the ends of the saddle is freaking you out, use a piece of bridge material at the very end of the slot to close things...leave a few thou space between the bottom of the saddle and the wood. Also keep in mind that the same string-to-string balance issues which we deal with on unamped guitars also crop up on pickup installations. If the instrument is poorly balanced to begin with, no pickup system is going to fix that issue. The usual approaches (e.g., tweaking saddle contact area under the strings, etc.) will work, but there can be some impacts on unamplified tone which can take time to iron out. Also note that the difference we see in saddle-on-bridge and saddle-on-UST-on bridge is usually MORE noticable in nylon string than in steel string, so there is no free ride. For lightly built customs or for instruments which should not be modified beyond the minimum due to value issues, it's a little tougher. I like the K&K pickup for these guitars...they have good fidelity in the basic Pure, the UltraPure active, and the multi sourced onboard and offboard preamp versions, and offer some flexibility. The simplest and most trouble-free for lightly built instruments is the Pure Classic, but it is a passive system and very sensitive to how responsive the instrument is...it is a miserable pickup for an overbuilt, heavy, unresponsive guitar, so I don't even consider installing it in most mass market or less responsive custom built stuff. Installed in a lightly built custom, the system is reliable, has great fidelity, requires no mods to the bridge or interior, and avoids the whole issue of battery life. http://www.chagarmusic.com/shop/kk-sound-pure-classic/ The Ultra Pure is one of my favorites for SS, and the classical version (UltraPure Classic) is likewise very good, adding 3dB gain with tone, volume and phase to mostly avoid the issue with noise floor seen in passive systems. Phase becomes important with duet or multisourced mic play, so worth looking for on either your pickup system or on your offboard DI/preamp box. http://www.bluestarmusic.com/k-and-k-sound-ultra-pure-classic-nylon-guitar-pickup-preamp.html Finally, on mic-only systems, the Lyric and the Hylander both work, but I def prefer the Lyric for general use. I've installed a range of boutique mics and SBTs, but the Lyric seems to be about as flexible and resistant to percussion as gooseneck mount mice or the grain of wheat mini-mice. http://www.guitarcenter.com/LR-Baggs-Lyric-Acoustic-Guitar-Microphone-109588046-i2979236.gc I consider a mic-only install to lack some flexibility...where possible, adding a UST or SBT with blend and/or external mix is always going to add flexibility. Always an option to add an external mic or two with a UST or SBT equipped guitar, then let the guy on the board handle the phase and blend work. Thanks for taking the time to put that together! Peal and stick or CA option for K&K transducers? Have you noticed a difference? Rare earth magnets. That's clever. |
Author: | SteveSmith [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
DannyV wrote: Peal and stick or CA option for K&K transducers? Have you noticed a difference? Rare earth magnets. That's clever. CA is my preference |
Author: | nyazzip [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
thanks all, for the wealth of information. i tend to play pretty aggressively at times(seems proportional to how much beer has been consumed), slapping/percussion/fingernails/all that, so that definitely needs to factor in. my last question: are the piezo installations transferable to another guitar, or do i lose a $200 device if the guitar is sold/trashed? |
Author: | nyazzip [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
it's not an expensive instrument: thats kind of why i asked about removal/salvage. i would even consider an external top mount, don't care what it looks like |
Author: | Mike Collins [ Fri Sep 27, 2013 12:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
Baggs I-beam active. Or as mentioned K & K. I've tried or installed ,everything made for Flammers &Classicals. Maria Z. is using a K & K system on her new Collins Guitar and loves it! It also depends on the quality of tone /volume/string to string clarity of the guitar you want to use it with! Mike |
Author: | Tai Fu [ Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
So how are instruments like saxophone, flutes, violins/viola, etc. amplified? Do they just play into a mike? |
Author: | fingerstyle1978 [ Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
Most of those instruments when played in concert halls are not amped. Jazz sax players play into mikes. I don't know what Jethro Tull used for his flute jamming but who cares anyways? Nobody is clamoring for flutes to be brought back into rock n roll!!! |
Author: | Goodin [ Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
I really like the K&K Quantum Trinity System I have set up in my '41 D-18. It produces a very natural amplified sound. They also have a set up for classical, which is essentially the Pure Classic with a goose-neck internal mic. http://kksound.com/products/quantumtrinity.php |
Author: | SteveSmith [ Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
Goodin wrote: I really like the K&K Quantum Trinity System I have set up in my '41 D-18. It produces a very natural amplified sound. They also have a set up for classical, which is essentially the Pure Classic with a goose-neck internal mic. http://kksound.com/products/quantumtrinity.php Gil, I've been interested in that one but was afraid I might get feedback or amplify noise from the other instruments when I'm in the middle of the rhythm section I play in. Do you think the mike increases the sensitivity to external sounds more than the mini by itself? |
Author: | Goodin [ Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
SteveSmith wrote: Goodin wrote: I really like the K&K Quantum Trinity System I have set up in my '41 D-18. It produces a very natural amplified sound. They also have a set up for classical, which is essentially the Pure Classic with a goose-neck internal mic. http://kksound.com/products/quantumtrinity.php Gil, I've been interested in that one but was afraid I might get feedback or amplify noise from the other instruments when I'm in the middle of the rhythm section I play in. Do you think the mike increases the sensitivity to external sounds more than the mini by itself? Hey Steve - Yes it can if the room is loud. You just have to be sure the mic isn't pointing right at the monitors. If the room is loud and monitors have to be cranked up it can give feedback for which you will have to turn down the mic and turn up the pickup. Or turn off the internal mic completely and use a stage mic. I find this the case only at rowdy bar gigs. Listening rooms are fine. Here is how I have the mic situated. Pointed sort of at an angle away from monitors. Attachment: 580069_10151513076184696_511349959_n.jpg
|
Author: | SteveSmith [ Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: best option for amplifying nylon string guitars |
Thanks Gil - might work for me since we usually use in-ear monitors. I suspect that system might work very nicely with a nylon string guitar. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |