Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:32 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 7:29 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 6:19 am
Posts: 1322
First name: Richard
Last Name: Hutchings
City: Warwick
State: RI
Zip/Postal Code: 02889
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Why do this? Seems like it's only purpose is to keep the part in place if the glue lets go. Top braces feather down to nothing so they're not holding anything if the glue lets go. I realize we want support as close to the edge as possible but once you feather down to nothing what's the difference? I'm sure there's more to this that I just don't know.

_________________
Hutch

Get the heck off the couch and go build a guitar!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 7:51 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 7:12 am
Posts: 679
Location: United States
Any brace that I taper down to nothing is behind the bridge, where the stress is upward, and is not tucked. Any brace ends that intersects the kerfed lining in front of the bridge area, where the stress is downward, are a minimum of .100" thick and are tucked.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 8:31 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 6:19 am
Posts: 1322
First name: Richard
Last Name: Hutchings
City: Warwick
State: RI
Zip/Postal Code: 02889
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
By tucking you're expecting the glue to fail and will rely on the lining to hold it in place. Or maybe because the brace is trapped in a tight joint there's less stress on the glue and less chance of failure. I think that makes sense. OK, I'm on board with it, just needed to discuss it to get my brain wrapped around it. Thanks James

_________________
Hutch

Get the heck off the couch and go build a guitar!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 9:19 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:02 am
Posts: 3227
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
First name: Barry
Last Name: Daniels
Feathering actually makes the brace more resistant to coming loose from the top than it would if you left it thick (un-tucked). It eliminates the stress riser at the end of the brace. If the top gets an external weight load, the feathered end can flex with the top, whereas a thick end will just pop loose.

The problem with tucking is that it makes the top too stiff where you need the most flexibility around the perimeter of the top behind the bridge.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 4:56 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:33 am
Posts: 1831
First name: Willard
Last Name: Guthrie
City: Cumberland
State: Maryland 21502
Zip/Postal Code: 21502
Country: United State
Focus: Repair
Status: Semi-pro
I think we may wish to differentiate between the historical Martin factory practice of tucking brace ends or bridge plate into the X brace and the common practice of pocketing the UTB or upper arms of the X-brace into the lining to more effectively transfer loads to the sides. The former dramatically escalates the difficulty of what should be a simple repair (e.g., regluing the end of a finger or tone bar), while the later avoids making the top carry the entire load when transferring downward/in-to-body loads from the UTB and upper X arms to the sides.

_________________
We have become a civilization that elevates idiots, prostitutes, and clowns. Am I still to defend it? Yes, for its principles. Yes, for what it was. Yes, for what it still may be.

-Mark Helprin, The Oceans and the Stars: A Sea Story, A War Story, A Love Story (A Novel)



These users thanked the author Woodie G for the post: jack (Tue Jul 16, 2019 5:17 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 11:47 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 3865
Location: United States
The problem with brace ends that are not properly tucked in is due the to low peel strength of most glues. Once the end come loose the whole brace can simply peel up fairly quickly.

Gibson used to use the nose of a belt sander to take the brace ends down to almost nothing. They would not bother to cut notches in the liners, but simply rely on clamping pressure to compress the liner wood. The problem is that they were using spruce for both the liners and the braces, and sometimes the liner was hard enough to compress the brace, rather than the other way around. The brace would fracture at the crush line at the first provocation, and peel up. Back when I did repairs I had several old Gibbys come in with the neck shifted inward, and no UTB. When I asked the customers that's admit that there had been a stick rattling around in the box, which they tossed as soon as they could fish it out. Pulling everything into line and replacing the UTB with one that had some height at the ends, and brackets to hold things in place resulted in a very nice little guitar that was stable.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com