Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 5:25 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 7:28 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 4:17 am
Posts: 150
First name: Gary
Last Name: Leddington
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Hi Folks

What is the recommended grain count per inch for bracewood? I have some Euro Spruce where the grain looks a little on the wide side.

I guess its different per species?

Any ball park figures would be great.

FTL

Image

_________________
www.leddingtonguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 8:25 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5418
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
I don't think grain count makes much difference, apart from appearance which doesn't count for much on braces.
Weight and stiffness is what counts, and it's quite easily measured.

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 9:04 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 4:17 am
Posts: 150
First name: Gary
Last Name: Leddington
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Any formula for that?

FTL

_________________
www.leddingtonguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 10:50 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:44 am
Posts: 6237
Location: Virginia
You might even be surprised to know that orientating the annular rings (grain) parallel to the top is actually stiffer then perpendicular.

Annular ring count isn't important as Colin mentioned. You can measure stiffness by doing deflection testing measuring the dimensions of the brace and pressure of deflection and of course weigh it with a scale.

Here's a long complicated article for ya :)

http://ukuleles.com/?page_id=579


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 5:39 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:14 pm
Posts: 439
First name: Mike
Last Name: Imbler
City: Wichita
State: KS
Zip/Postal Code: 67204
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Very true on stiffness. I give up that benefit though and still orient with vertical grain because of ease of carving, and my gut feeling that they are more resistant to cracking/splitting with the grain vertical.

jfmckenna wrote:
You might even be surprised to know that orientating the annular rings (grain) parallel to the top is actually stiffer then perpendicular.

Annular ring count isn't important as Colin mentioned. You can measure stiffness by doing deflection testing measuring the dimensions of the brace and pressure of deflection and of course weigh it with a scale.

Here's a long complicated article for ya :)

http://ukuleles.com/?page_id=579


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 7:15 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:35 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: United States
First name: Joe
Last Name: Beaver
City: Lake Forest
State: California
Focus: Build
I agree with Gary, it would be nice to have a standardized test for brace deflection. Then we could talk apples to apples.

As far as grain orientation in braces, I just don't see much difference except maybe a little in expansion/contraction for humidity changes. (seems to me flat sawn braces will deflect slightly less than quarter sawn, but I use CF in my braces so it probably makes no difference.)

_________________
Joe Beaver
Maker of Sawdust


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 8:10 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:44 am
Posts: 6237
Location: Virginia
Imbler wrote:
Very true on stiffness. I give up that benefit though and still orient with vertical grain because of ease of carving, and my gut feeling that they are more resistant to cracking/splitting with the grain vertical.

jfmckenna wrote:
You might even be surprised to know that orientating the annular rings (grain) parallel to the top is actually stiffer then perpendicular.

Annular ring count isn't important as Colin mentioned. You can measure stiffness by doing deflection testing measuring the dimensions of the brace and pressure of deflection and of course weigh it with a scale.

Here's a long complicated article for ya :)

http://ukuleles.com/?page_id=579

Yeah kind of like the one piece VS two piece scarf joint neck argument. The one piece neck has a lot of run out in the angled head stock. Of course a flat sawn brace has a better gluing surface :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 8:16 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:14 pm
Posts: 439
First name: Mike
Last Name: Imbler
City: Wichita
State: KS
Zip/Postal Code: 67204
Country: usa
Focus: Build
jfmckenna wrote:
Imbler wrote:
Very true on stiffness. I give up that benefit though and still orient with vertical grain because of ease of carving, and my gut feeling that they are more resistant to cracking/splitting with the grain vertical.

jfmckenna wrote:
You might even be surprised to know that orientating the annular rings (grain) parallel to the top is actually stiffer then perpendicular.

Annular ring count isn't important as Colin mentioned. You can measure stiffness by doing deflection testing measuring the dimensions of the brace and pressure of deflection and of course weigh it with a scale.

Here's a long complicated article for ya :)

http://ukuleles.com/?page_id=579

Yeah kind of like the one piece VS two piece scarf joint neck argument. The one piece neck has a lot of run out in the angled head stock. Of course a flat sawn brace has a better gluing surface :)


Ha! Excellent point about the gluing surface. It's all about trade-offs, your neck description is a great example.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 10:24 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:17 pm
Posts: 1162
City: Escondido
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 92029
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Imbler wrote:
Very true on stiffness. I give up that benefit though and still orient with vertical grain because of ease of carving, and my gut feeling that they are more resistant to cracking/splitting with the grain vertical.


Yeah, I thought I was being clever putting in flat sawn braces. What a PITA to carve. Never again.



These users thanked the author rlrhett for the post: Imbler (Sat Aug 12, 2017 12:55 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 2:43 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 4:17 am
Posts: 150
First name: Gary
Last Name: Leddington
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Great discussion guys... thanks for the tips.

G.

_________________
www.leddingtonguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 4:00 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5418
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
You can easily compare stiffness by taking 2 braces same dimensions and tapping them or dropping them on the bench - stiffer one rings at a higher pitch.
Or you could do a tap test to get absolute measurement of MoE from dimensions and vibrational frequency (Gore Book)

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bobgramann and 160 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com