No sure what number it is????
It is Spruce over good ol’ sapelle. Simple rosette. Nothing fancy here. Just trying to get a tight build. Binding is flame maple. No purfling.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
| Official Luthiers Forum! http://luthiersforum.com/forum/ |
|
| Build number ... hmmm 9? http://luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10101&t=51108 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | SnowManSnow [ Fri Oct 12, 2018 3:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Build number ... hmmm 9? |
No sure what number it is???? It is Spruce over good ol’ sapelle. Simple rosette. Nothing fancy here. Just trying to get a tight build. Binding is flame maple. No purfling. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
| Author: | sdsollod [ Fri Oct 12, 2018 3:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
Lookin' good. |
|
| Author: | Joe Beaver [ Fri Oct 12, 2018 4:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
I've built several out of Sapele. It makes a fine sounding guitar. Love the shape. The end graft is very nice. Bracing might be on the heavy side but who am I to say? Looks like you are off to a great start. |
|
| Author: | SnowManSnow [ Fri Oct 12, 2018 4:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
Btw. My binding was SUPPOSE to be a good bit thinner (top to bottom) than it is/.... then my router base slipped AGAIN. I’m not sure how that keeps happening w my colt. I thought I had fixed the stupid thing Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
| Author: | SnowManSnow [ Fri Oct 12, 2018 4:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
 Came close to making a perfect joint where the bindings touch on the back but alas... it’s simply very close Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
| Author: | Glen H [ Fri Oct 12, 2018 5:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
You’re not supposed to lose count!! |
|
| Author: | SnowManSnow [ Fri Oct 12, 2018 6:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
Glen H wrote: You’re not supposed to lose count!! Ha I know.... ummmm I’ll call it 9 then  Maple binding installed:) I’ll “flush” it tomorrow. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
| Author: | SnowManSnow [ Fri Oct 12, 2018 6:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
| Author: | banjopicks [ Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
This never slips. I never understood the need for anything else. Attachment: P1010028.JPG
|
|
| Author: | rob91bob [ Sat Oct 13, 2018 8:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
SnowManSnow wrote: Btw. My binding was SUPPOSE to be a good bit thinner (top to bottom) than it is/.... then my router base slipped AGAIN. I’m not sure how that keeps happening w my colt. I thought I had fixed the stupid thing Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro There is an arrow on the base near the top that needs to point to the lock icon before you close the locking lever. I had the same thing happen to me. |
|
| Author: | doncaparker [ Sat Oct 13, 2018 8:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
Hutch— The reason I prefer concentric bearings instead of a guide finger is because, with a guide finger, getting the horizontal depth of cut to stay consistent takes a bit more work. You always have to keep the workpiece perpendicular to the guide finger, and with curved surfaces, that can take a few passes to make sure you consistently cut as deep as possible. With concentric bearings on the cutter, that is never an issue. Both can get the job done. |
|
| Author: | SnowManSnow [ Sat Oct 13, 2018 9:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
rob91bob wrote: SnowManSnow wrote: Btw. My binding was SUPPOSE to be a good bit thinner (top to bottom) than it is/.... then my router base slipped AGAIN. I’m not sure how that keeps happening w my colt. I thought I had fixed the stupid thing Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro There is an arrow on the base near the top that needs to point to the lock icon before you close the locking lever. I had the same thing happen to me. Yea. It is locked/ was. No real foul this time thankfully. I’ve got to figure out what’s happening w that thing Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
| Author: | SnowManSnow [ Sat Oct 13, 2018 9:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
banjopicks wrote: This never slips. I never understood the need for anything else. Attachment: P1010028.JPG The difference is that with a binding cutter the router follows the curvature of the sides so that your channels are the same all the way around. It floats on top as you push it through. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
| Author: | Freeman [ Sat Oct 13, 2018 9:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
banjopicks wrote: This never slips. I never understood the need for anything else. Attachment: P1010028.JPG I know you build mandolins, can you show me a picture of a F5 sitting in that? I find I need a floating router that indexes off the top or bottom because I build all sorts of arched top or recurved instruments but I would love to be able to do it with a router table. Attachment: IMG_3336-1.jpg
|
|
| Author: | banjopicks [ Sat Oct 13, 2018 9:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
I wish I could but I don't take pics while I'm working. All I do is rest the edge of the instrument on the tongue and try to keep the instrument level by eye and feel as I go around. It's not as difficult as it sounds. Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk |
|
| Author: | SnowManSnow [ Sat Oct 13, 2018 10:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
A few updates    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
| Author: | SnowManSnow [ Sat Oct 13, 2018 10:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
And the sanding block I made ha:)  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
| Author: | olmorton71 [ Sun Oct 14, 2018 7:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
Love it all Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
| Author: | Pmaj7 [ Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
Lookin good Snow! New username, same ole Pat Macaluso! |
|
| Author: | SnowManSnow [ Sun Oct 14, 2018 10:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
Pmaj7 wrote: Lookin good Snow! New username, same ole Pat Macaluso! Thanks pat At number 8 I’m noticing I’m more capable of fixing my boo boos ha:) Definitely the best binding job so far;) no gaps!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
| Author: | banjopicks [ Mon Oct 15, 2018 8:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
You got me thinking about my method of holding. I may try a masonite ring just inside of the binding ledge to keep it level. Then I could get rid of the tongue part and just use the side stop. I'm not sure it's needed but I may give it a try and see if I notice a difference. This jig is so I easy to make and use. I can't imagine how these new fangled ones can be any better except be able to see the cut which doesn't seem to be an advantage to me. |
|
| Author: | Ruby50 [ Mon Oct 15, 2018 9:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
Sometime the bit will slip in the chuck making the cut deeper. This can happen if you seat the bit all the way into the chuck until it touches bottom. You should never do that, but stick it in til it touches, then pull it back out about 1/16", then tighten the hell out of the chuck |
|
| Author: | banjopicks [ Mon Oct 15, 2018 9:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
I heard putting an o-ring on the shaft solves the problem of putting the bit in too far. |
|
| Author: | banjopicks [ Mon Oct 15, 2018 9:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
SnowManSnow wrote: And the sanding block I made ha:) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro Now that's a nice sanding block. |
|
| Author: | SnowManSnow [ Mon Oct 15, 2018 11:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Build number ... hmmm 9? |
banjopicks wrote: SnowManSnow wrote: And the sanding block I made ha:) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro Now that's a nice sanding block. I wanted to test out some tru oil finish:$) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|