Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 8:08 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: The 000 butternut twins
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2021 9:18 pm 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:25 am
Posts: 83
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
First name: Andy
Last Name: Bounsall
City: Ottawa
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: K2H 7C7
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Those of you who know me or are familiar with my work know that I like to experiment with different designs, non-traditional sound hole placement, and less frequently used tone woods. I often get asked how movement of the sound hole and changing the bracing affects the sound of a guitar. My answer is usually a bit hand-wavy and theoretical. No more. With my current project, I’m hoping to come up with a more concrete answer of the similarities and differences by building a practical example.

The plan is to build two similar, but quite different guitars. I want them both to be extremely lightweight and responsive instruments. Both will be made from butternut re-sawed from the same boards. Both will have Engelmann spruce tops from the same supplier. Both will be 000/OM sized bodies. Both will have a cutaway. Both will have the neck/body joint at the 12th fret. Both will have necks and fretboards of the same materials. One will be built with a center sound hole and traditional X bracing. The other will have multiple sound holes and be braced using an offset asymmetrical X bracing pattern.

I’ll post photos and updates here periodically, starting with the pics below. More frequent progress updates will be posted on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/bounsallgutarworks). It should be an interesting experiment. Stay tuned.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Andy
www.bounsallguitarworks.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The butternut twins
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2021 9:43 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:47 pm
Posts: 2422
First name: Jay
Last Name: De Rocher
City: Bothell
State: Washington
This looks like it will be fun to follow. The butternut grain looks cool.

What's the thinking behind the asymmetric x-braces? Is that a result of needing to thread between the small sound holes?

It looks like the guitar with the small sound holes will have some sort of larger neck block arrangement. How will that work?

_________________
Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right - Robert Hunter


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2021 11:35 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 12:04 am
Posts: 5743
First name: Chris
Last Name: Pile
City: Wichita
State: Kansas
Country: Good old US of A
Focus: Repair
Status: Professional
Kewlness. Will be watching for the butternut...

_________________
"Act your age, not your shoe size" - Prince


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 6:40 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2019 12:00 pm
Posts: 255
Location: Tennessee
First name: Terry
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Nice. I always build two at a time also. Just seems to make more sense in terms of tool/jig setup and what-not.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The butternut twins
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 7:27 am 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:25 am
Posts: 83
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
First name: Andy
Last Name: Bounsall
City: Ottawa
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: K2H 7C7
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
J De Rocher wrote:
This looks like it will be fun to follow. The butternut grain looks cool.

What's the thinking behind the asymmetric x-braces? Is that a result of needing to thread between the small sound holes?

It looks like the guitar with the small sound holes will have some sort of larger neck block arrangement. How will that work?


Many years ago there was a now defunct company on the west coast of the USA called Tacoma Guitars. They built some interesting guitars with paisley shaped sound holes in the upper bout and incorporated some novel ideas. I always liked the way those guitars sounded so the offset asymmetrical X bracing is my adaptation of how some of those guitars were built. Yes, it does work well with the multiple sound holes. I actually layout the bracing first and then adjust the sound holes to fit around them.

The large neck block on the drawing is a bit misleading perhaps. It’s really a normal sized neck block with an extension on top to support the end of the fretboard. Here’s a pic of what I mean, but it’s upside down. What looks like a “foot” in the pic goes directly beneath the soundboard.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Andy
www.bounsallguitarworks.com



These users thanked the author Andy Bounsall for the post: J De Rocher (Tue Mar 23, 2021 10:27 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 7:40 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:44 am
Posts: 6232
Location: Virginia
I once built two 'identical' guitars side by side. All the wood for these guitars was cut successively from the same log one right after the other. So they were about as close to identical as possible. A few things that id did not do back then was stiffness testing but I did measure everything to be the same width, height and so on. The braces were all measured the same and came from the same billet. The tops were the same, backs, sides and so on. Everything was built to be as close to the same as possible. I think the fret boards were the only things that were not from the same log.

In the end I ended up building two guitars that sounded different. They just end up having their own personality.

Of course what you are doing is different and may even be more practical in terms of learning something between the two designs. What might even be more valuable is building two pairs(4 guitars). That way you could compare the two designs together then compare each individual design with it's opposite and it's opposites opposite.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 8:09 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5398
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
And how do you tell any difference which is due to the sound hole's/placement, and how much to the bracing?

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 10:15 am 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:25 am
Posts: 83
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
First name: Andy
Last Name: Bounsall
City: Ottawa
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: K2H 7C7
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Colin North wrote:
And how do you tell any difference which is due to the sound hole's/placement, and how much to the bracing?


Can’t...but I’m interested in the combination rather than each individually.

_________________
Andy
www.bounsallguitarworks.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 11:48 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:28 pm
Posts: 188
First name: Chuck
Last Name: Skarsaune
City: Butler
State: TN
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
The butternut is really pretty.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:17 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 4:50 pm
Posts: 1091
Location: Goodrich, MI
First name: Ken
Last Name: Nagy
City: Goodrich
State: MI
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Interesting. Is the grain arrangement on the block for strength in bolting on the neck?

I've tried building 2 or 3 violins at the same time, but one always gets ahead, and I end up with 1! It always seems like a good idea. I need to follow through.

Maybe the next build.

_________________
Why be normal?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:27 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:18 pm
Posts: 383
Location: Somerset UK
State: West Somerset
Country: UK
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I imagine you have made the total area of the (pretty) array of small holes to match a 'normal' soundhole...?

Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:04 pm 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:25 am
Posts: 83
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
First name: Andy
Last Name: Bounsall
City: Ottawa
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: K2H 7C7
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Ken Nagy wrote:
Interesting. Is the grain arrangement on the block for strength in bolting on the neck?

I like the part of the neck block the glues to the rim to have grain running vertically. If the rim was to split, the split wouldn’t propagate through the neck block. However, that’d mean the back would be glued to end grain, which I don’t like. So, I make the neck block with horizontal grain on the inner half. That gives the back some long grain to hang on to. Probably doesn’t make much of a difference, but I sleep better. :)


Dave m2 wrote:
I imagine you have made the total area of the (pretty) array of small holes to match a 'normal' soundhole...?

The single sound hole is 4” diameter. The total area of the multiple holes on the second guitar, if I did the math correctly, is about equal to a 3.6” hole. So...close, but not identical.

_________________
Andy
www.bounsallguitarworks.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 5:53 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:14 am
Posts: 982
Location: Shefford, Québec
First name: Tim
Last Name: Mullin
City: Shefford
State: QC
Zip/Postal Code: J2M 1R5
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Andy Bounsall wrote:
Ken Nagy wrote:
Interesting. Is the grain arrangement on the block for strength in bolting on the neck?

I like the part of the neck block the glues to the rim to have grain running vertically. If the rim was to split, the split wouldn’t propagate through the neck block. However, that’d mean the back would be glued to end grain, which I don’t like. So, I make the neck block with horizontal grain on the inner half. That gives the back some long grain to hang on to. Probably doesn’t make much of a difference, but I sleep better. :)

I suspect what Ken was noticing was that you’ve managed to glue 3 pieces of wood in a way that ignores the different directions of differential shrinkage and swelling. It’s not a stable structure.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 6:21 pm 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:25 am
Posts: 83
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
First name: Andy
Last Name: Bounsall
City: Ottawa
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: K2H 7C7
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Tim Mullin wrote:
...It’s not a stable structure.

Ok. That’s a fair enough opinion. That particular piece was for a guitar I built several years ago. It hasn’t proved to be an issue yet but I hear what you’re saying. Anyway, the photo was included here simply to illustrate what the ‘large neck block’ shown in the drawing was referring to.

_________________
Andy
www.bounsallguitarworks.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 8:00 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:17 am
Posts: 1263
First name: John
Last Name: Arnold
City: Newport
State: TN
Zip/Postal Code: 37821
Country: USA
Focus: Repair
Status: Professional
IMHO, your analysis is backwards. A split side is not likely to split into a block that is many times thicker. But the reverse surely happens....... the block splits, then the sides follow.
I would do a simple three-ply laminated block. I am not a fan of the vertical orientation.

Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk

_________________
John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 8:31 pm 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:25 am
Posts: 83
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
First name: Andy
Last Name: Bounsall
City: Ottawa
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: K2H 7C7
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Thanks for your thoughts regarding neck block grain orientation, folks. Appreciate it but maybe that discussion could be taken to a new topic rather than derailing this thread.

_________________
Andy
www.bounsallguitarworks.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2021 8:14 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 2:03 pm
Posts: 569
First name: Toonces
Last Name: the Cat
City: New Smyrna Beach
State: FL
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Hi Andy,
Interesting project -- it will be fun to see how it turns out.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: banjopicks, Dan Miller and 66 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com