Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 5:25 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:45 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:35 am
Posts: 671
Location: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
With the very capable help of Brad Way, together we designed a tailpiece for a custom project. Unfortunately, it is as complicated as it is beautiful. It will require a 5 axis machine to pull it off. I'm looking for someone capable and willing to do a one-off (it would be more, except, and of course, the project is left-handed) piece out of 6061-T6 aluminum, +/-.0025 (.005\") tolerance, and a surface finish super smooth for a subsequent anodized finish. Note that the mating surfaces of the piece do not need to be polished, i.e., the inside of the mounting flange, and the underside of the body.

Suggestions?

All the best,

David D. Berkowitz
Berkowitz Guitars


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:19 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:52 am
Posts: 1388
First name: Zeke
Last Name: McKee
City: Goodlettsville
State: TN
Zip/Postal Code: 37070
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I hope you got some money set aside for this thing. It sounds like it would be very expensive. Especially if you don't have a cad model.

May I ask why you have to have it done on a 5axis? I know if someone just happens to have one laying around it can make run times a lot shorter and can increase accuracy, but finding someone with a 3 or 4 axis machine will be a lot easier and you could just run 2 operations. Especially for just a 1 off part. It woul be cheaper IMO.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:24 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 5:46 am
Posts: 2931
Location: United States
+1 on the multiple setups.

_________________
Jim Watts
http://jameswattsguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:25 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:35 am
Posts: 671
Location: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Zeke, its all in Solidworks. I'm exploring some combination techniques employing 3 axis, annealing and bending the part.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:32 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:52 am
Posts: 1388
First name: Zeke
Last Name: McKee
City: Goodlettsville
State: TN
Zip/Postal Code: 37070
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Ok solid works just made your life much easier, and cheaper. I think doing it in a couple of stages on a 3 or 4 axis would probably be the way to go. I don't know what the part looks like but if the bend is complicated it may be better to cut rather than bend. Tooling for a special bending fixture would be high dollar. If its a simple 90 degree bend or similar it wouldnt be bad though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:54 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:35 am
Posts: 671
Location: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
The recommendation from an guitar industry guru was to have Brad flatten the part, have it machined, make a two-part hardwood die, anneal the aluminum and bend it in the vice with the die. The part is designed to mortice into the side of the guitar at a particular point, so it's a very shallow curve, and discontinuous. The guru's point was that folks have been making parts for 100's of years without CNC, and there is no need to do everything by machine.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:59 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:52 am
Posts: 1388
First name: Zeke
Last Name: McKee
City: Goodlettsville
State: TN
Zip/Postal Code: 37070
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Well he's right. In a sense. CNC is more accurate and faster in a production setting. I still cut a lot of one offs by hand though. Depending on how complicated it is, it can take longer to program and set up a machine than to cut it by hand. (only issue is a lot of "machinist" today don't know how to work a manual machine)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:18 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:28 am
Posts: 106
First name: Rienk
Last Name: Ayers
City: Santa Maria
State: California
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
ZekeM wrote:
Well he's right. In a sense. CNC is more accurate and faster in a production setting. I still cut a lot of one offs by hand though. Depending on how complicated it is, it can take longer to program and set up a machine than to cut it by hand. (only issue is a lot of "machinist" today don't know how to work a manual machine)

What's a manual machine?

laughing6-hehe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:50 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 2:39 am
Posts: 519
well, that would be a machine that is operated manually.......like a manual lathe, milling machine, table saw, router, jointer, planer....I can keep going if necessary beehive

Mike

ps....drill press, mortiser, stroke sander, wide belt sander, shaper, gang saw, ....... more? laughing6-hehe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:58 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:28 am
Posts: 106
First name: Rienk
Last Name: Ayers
City: Santa Maria
State: California
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
turmite wrote:
well, that would be a machine that is operated manually.......like a manual lathe, milling machine, table saw, router, jointer, planer....I can keep going if necessary
ps....drill press, mortiser, stroke sander, wide belt sander, shaper, gang saw, ....... more?

You mean there are machines that aren't hooked up to a computer, and a human actually has to control it?

How archaic! That's almost like... what's that word?

Craftsmanship?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:28 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:20 pm
Posts: 456
Focus: Build
i suspect that you don't wish display the part on an online forum so as a result opinions are naturally going to be all over the place -although having a picture posted would obviously help a lot.

fwiw an artifact of "design freedom" is lack of concern of how to actually mfg something in the first place. but then again, it is this very same process that fuels innovation to develop new ways to make things. sort of figuring a way out of a self-imposed "design trap" so to speak.

:)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 5:26 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 3:24 am
Posts: 744
Location: United States
The part could probably be made on a 4 axis mill if it helps. The key part is the 4th axis being the rotary axis which is critical.

_________________
Brad
Avon, OH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 5:54 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:52 am
Posts: 1388
First name: Zeke
Last Name: McKee
City: Goodlettsville
State: TN
Zip/Postal Code: 37070
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
See now that makes it much simpler to find a machine and cheaper. The thing that worries me is the fact that the OP has considered bending the part which leads me to believe it is pretty thin which could lead to issues when trying to cut on a 4 axis. Like arie said its hard to know when we are just guessing about the part. Also mr berkowitz mentioned annealing. Would that not defeat the purpose of using 6061 T6, which has been heat treated? If you need the strength annealing reverse the HT in a sense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:03 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:35 am
Posts: 671
Location: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Zeke, the heat treating and bending was a recommendation of a very talented, innovative and HIGHLY respected professional member of the community, who has advanced work in metals, carbon fiber, and other materials. If anyone knows how it can be made it would be he. Not at liberty to divulge my source, but suffice it to say he is one of the big dogs. I should add that he saw the drawings.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:08 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:52 am
Posts: 1388
First name: Zeke
Last Name: McKee
City: Goodlettsville
State: TN
Zip/Postal Code: 37070
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I'm not saying it won't work I'm just saying you might as well start with 6061-O which is essentially the same but already annealed. I don't see any reason why you would need a tremendous amount of strength in a tailpiece anyhow. Im just trying to save you some trouble and money. :)

It sounds like you already have some very capable people already available to help you, that said if you cant find a 4 axis mill I have 2 and can quote the part for you. Im not really into doing one off parts so it would probably be cheaper to find someone who does, but it may not be. Some shops these days are really charging a lot more than I think necessary. Anyhow best of luck!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:26 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:28 am
Posts: 106
First name: Rienk
Last Name: Ayers
City: Santa Maria
State: California
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
ZekeM wrote:
I'm not saying it won't work I'm just saying you might as well start with 6061-O which is essentially the same but already annealed. I don't see any reason why you would need a tremendous amount of strength in a tailpiece anyhow. Im just trying to save you some trouble and money. :)


I agree with Zeke. I build airplanes, and we have all sorts of problems with engineers calling out bending T6 material, or welding it for that matter. Once you introduce the stress or heat, you have to anneal it to get the strength back in - end of story. Like Zeke said, if you don't need that much strength (for 300 lbs of tension, you don't) then don't bother using something that is not right for the part - go with T0 and save yourself a lot of potential problems.

Frankly, a tailpiece can't be that big; i'd start with a solid block of aluminum and bandsaw out the rough shape... you could actually stack a bunch of these tailpieces together in a "nest" and save a lot of material - and flip it over and do it on the other side of the block - just like getting two solid necks out of one piece of mahogany/cedar.

Have fun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 5:42 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:20 pm
Posts: 456
Focus: Build
ZekeM wrote:
Also mr berkowitz mentioned annealing. Would that not defeat the purpose of using 6061 T6, which has been heat treated? If you need the strength annealing reverse the HT in a sense.


depending upon the severity of the bend T6 can be stress relieved after forming and brought back to a T6 temper. depending once again upon the degree of the bend, the loss of strength would generally only be about 5%. part geometry will determine the final processing which could range from a simple 18 hour cycle at 320F to more involved processes where final outcome can be dependent on many, many factors. keep in mind that if the process isn't carefully controlled, grain growth will become something to deal with which will manifest itself in a pebbly appearance to the part and just sanding it smooth will only hide the problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 6:13 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:35 am
Posts: 671
Location: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Folks, the part is 4.5" long, generally P shaped in cross section, the flange portion is .150 and the head about .375" x .450 tall. It is designed to fit on a section of the lower bout between the apex and the waist, really on the upswing to the apex. So the piece might have a rise of .500" over that 4." It is not that severe a bend. I understand all your skepticism but we're not talking aircraft here, we just need to hold 140lbs of tension. That's it. Furthermore, the person who made the bending recommendation is one of the THE materials and process innovators of the past 25 years of guitar making. I can only think of one other who fits that description in the industry.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 7:18 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:28 am
Posts: 106
First name: Rienk
Last Name: Ayers
City: Santa Maria
State: California
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
dberkowitz wrote:
Furthermore, the person who made the bending recommendation is one of the THE materials and process innovators of the past 25 years of guitar making. I can only think of one other who fits that description in the industry.

Surely someone like that has access to a five-axis machining centers?
Regardless, it sounds like you have it under control. Please post photos when you have it done!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 8:19 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:52 am
Posts: 1388
First name: Zeke
Last Name: McKee
City: Goodlettsville
State: TN
Zip/Postal Code: 37070
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Rienk wrote:
dberkowitz wrote:
Furthermore, the person who made the bending recommendation is one of the THE materials and process innovators of the past 25 years of guitar making. I can only think of one other who fits that description in the industry.

Surely someone like that has access to a five-axis machining centers?
Regardless, it sounds like you have it under control. Please post photos when you have it done!



I also would love to see pics when its done! It sounds very very interesting. Im sitting here trying to draw it out in my head laughing6-hehe
Best of luck and keep us updated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:00 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:20 pm
Posts: 456
Focus: Build
dberkowitz wrote:
Furthermore, the person who made the bending recommendation is one of the THE materials and process innovators of the past 25 years of guitar making. I can only think of one other who fits that description in the industry.


rhetoric aside, imo it would appear that your designer engineered you into a hole, and your expert bailed you out. this project seems like a slam-dunk. so just do it! [:Y:]

good luck


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com