Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 9:17 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Same rules apply to all forums at the Luthiers Forum.




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 11:05 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 552
City: winnipeg
State: manitoba
Country: canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I am flying blind on this one. Helping a friend put together a mandolin that he started twenty years ago. His workmanship is very good but his book/plans do not include top thickness. I do not want to spoil his good work by making the top too thick or too thin. If I have a range, I can help him to produce a decent sounding instrument on a long-delayed project.

My best guess is 90-100 thou.

Any help would be appreciated.

Bob :ugeek:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:20 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 10:17 pm
Posts: 190
First name: Raymond
Last Name: Pipkin
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I'm not pretending to be an knowledgable , I've only built three, but my tops were .110ish Sitka. One perfectly flat, and two with a very slight radius, ladder bracing on all three.

They are all tolerable for tone, but need a firm strum to produce volume, and then they sound kind of harsh. I think I would go thinner if I did one again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 7:42 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 552
City: winnipeg
State: manitoba
Country: canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Ray:
Thank you for the comment.
It makes my 90 to 100 thou a reasonable number if a tad thin.
He is using ladder bracing and will likely glue it in my go-bar deck using 25 or 15 foot dish.
I may recommend a 1/16" maple bridge patch for safety.

Bob :ugeek:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 7:23 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:26 pm
Posts: 166
First name: Peter
Last Name: Coombe
City: Bega
State: NSW
Zip/Postal Code: 2550
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
The tops on my flattop mandolins are 3mm thick. I use European or Engelmenn Spruce, or King Billy Pine tops.They are X braced with carbon fibre reinforcement and are radiused with a 15ft radius. Bracing is more important than thickness because it is the braces that provide just about all the structural strength. Just an X is not sufficient, mine are braced similar to a guitar, but without the tonebars and with additional bracing under the tailpiece tp stop the top folding in under the tailpiece. The X and the cross brace are carbon fibre reinforced. There is no bridge patch. Flattop mandolins have a nasty tendancy to fold in around the soundhole, so the challenge is to have the thing strong enough so it won't fold up, but at the same time to be flexible enough to sound good. Experience has shown me my system works. The mandolins are stable, they stay in tune, there is hardly any sinkage in the top when the strings are installed, and they sound great. Not as refined sounding as my carved top mandolins, but are noticably louder and with huge ring and sustain, and most important sound clean, unlike a lot of other flattop mandolins. You can play them real loud with no loss of sound quality. People seem to like them. They are fun to make and play.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 7:45 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:04 pm
Posts: 712
First name: Doug
Last Name: Balzer
City: Calgary
State: Alberta
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
peter.coombe wrote:
The tops on my flattop mandolins are 3mm thick. I use European or Engelmenn Spruce, or King Billy Pine tops.They are X braced with carbon fibre reinforcement and are radiused with a 15ft radius. Bracing is more important than thickness because it is the braces that provide just about all the structural strength. Just an X is not sufficient, mine are braced similar to a guitar, but without the tonebars and with additional bracing under the tailpiece tp stop the top folding in under the tailpiece. The X and the cross brace are carbon fibre reinforced. There is no bridge patch. Flattop mandolins have a nasty tendancy to fold in around the soundhole, so the challenge is to have the thing strong enough so it won't fold up, but at the same time to be flexible enough to sound good. Experience has shown me my system works. The mandolins are stable, they stay in tune, there is hardly any sinkage in the top when the strings are installed, and they sound great. Not as refined sounding as my carved top mandolins, but are noticably louder and with huge ring and sustain, and most important sound clean, unlike a lot of other flattop mandolins. You can play them real loud with no loss of sound quality. People seem to like them. They are fun to make and play.

Do you have a pic of your bracing?

_________________
Doug

Don't let fear or common sense stop you from trying to build something


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 8:21 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 552
City: winnipeg
State: manitoba
Country: canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I have finally seen the book that he is building it from. The book calls for 3/32 (94 thou, 2.38 mm). They use an X brace with three tone-bars and two side braces. There are two transverse braces, above and below the sound-hole.

We have sanded the sound-board to 95 thou.
This week's project is to profile the neck and prepare the Spanish heel.

Thank you for the help.

Bob :ugeek:



These users thanked the author unkabob for the post: Dmaxwell (Sat Jan 18, 2020 1:54 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:51 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 12:12 pm
Posts: 3290
First name: Bryan
Last Name: Bear
City: St. Louis
State: Mo
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I have only made one mandolin it was a flat top with a fixed bridge (no tailpiece) so the forces on the top are different. I has an x brace and one tone bar (neither of which I would call beefy). I'll have to measure the top thickness bit it is likely around 0.1 - 0.12". It is holding up to string tension just fine.

_________________
Bryan Bear PMoMC

Take care of your feet, and your feet will take care of you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 12:51 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:26 pm
Posts: 166
First name: Peter
Last Name: Coombe
City: Bega
State: NSW
Zip/Postal Code: 2550
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Quote:
Do you have a pic of your bracing?


Picture and more info here -

http://www.anzlf.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4932

I have now made about a dozen of these mandolins, and around 150 carved top mandolins.



These users thanked the author peter.coombe for the post: Doug Balzer (Sun Oct 20, 2013 9:04 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 1:39 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 12:12 pm
Posts: 3290
First name: Bryan
Last Name: Bear
City: St. Louis
State: Mo
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I intended to measure the soundboard thickness on my flat top (mentioned above) but I can't fit my calipers in the little sound hole without taking all the strings off. I did find a picture of the bracing. Remember this is a glued pinless bridge not a floating bridge with a tailpiece. The bridge plate is very thin and light. The braces are just less than 1/4 inch wide and 1/2 inch tall at the X and taper down fro there. The top is domed to whatever dome I use for guitar tops (I have never measured my dish in terms of ft radius but it is based on the deflected arch recommended in C&N). Once strung, the soundboard did rise in the bridge are, but not my much. The geometry worked out pretty much as I planned which was good because I was flying by the seat of my pants, and wasn't 100% sure I was bracing it well enough. . .

Attachment:
top_back.JPG


Here you can see that bridge belling was not really an issue.

Attachment:
bridge side.JPG


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Bryan Bear PMoMC

Take care of your feet, and your feet will take care of you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 6:11 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:26 pm
Posts: 166
First name: Peter
Last Name: Coombe
City: Bega
State: NSW
Zip/Postal Code: 2550
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Mandolins with a fixed bridge are a completely different animal. The forces on the top are quite different, and they will sound different. Mandolins usually have a floating bridge and a tailpiece, so the force on the bridge is a downwards force only. The tailpiece has a rotating force from the pull of the strings. A fixed bridge mandolin, however, like a guitar has a rotating force on the bridge, and there is no tailpiece. The bracing and thickness of the top need to reflect these differences so if your mandolin has a floating bridge, a fixed bridge design is of not much help. The bracing of a floating bridge mandolin needs to resist the tendancy of the bridge to sink into the top, and also to resist the tendancy of the tailpiece to rotate into the top. These are the most common failure points of a mandolin top. Either the top sinks, or the top breaks or bends under the tailpiece. On the other hand, a fixed bridge mandolin or guitar top will tend to sink in front of the bridge and bulge upwards behind the bridge.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 9:16 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 552
City: winnipeg
State: manitoba
Country: canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Thank you for the details. Your help has been really useful. This is not an ukulele and eight steel strings makes me nervous.
I would feel safe using Bryan's bracing pattern using a 1/16" maple bridge patch and a wide tail-block with a tailpiece. The sides and back are plenty thick.

Bob :ugeek:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com