Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Wed Aug 06, 2025 11:16 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 10:35 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:04 pm
Posts: 712
First name: Doug
Last Name: Balzer
City: Calgary
State: Alberta
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Just getting a feel for what target weights for bridges are out there...not including saddle and pins I'm around 31 grams +\- with ebony.

_________________
Doug

Don't let fear or common sense stop you from trying to build something


Last edited by Doug Balzer on Sun Mar 30, 2014 11:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 10:44 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:10 am
Posts: 522
First name: Martin
Last Name: Kelly
City: Tampa
State: FL
Zip/Postal Code: 33634
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Doug, probably not much help, since I've only been building classicals, but I try to come in around 20 grams using rosewood. Seems like this has been a recommended target in some of the past threads I've read, even for steel strings. Also seems like ebony tends to run a little heavier when people have discussed various woods (e.g., rosewood versus ebony).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 11:46 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 12:57 pm
Posts: 903
Location: London, England
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
27 gram 6x1-ish ebony bridge on my #2
15ish gram bridge on the little classical I just finished.

I'm thinking of experimenting with cf on my next.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 12:18 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 3820
Location: Taiwan
First name: Tai
Last Name: Fu
City: Taipei
Country: Taiwan
Focus: Repair
Status: Semi-pro
I made a bridge out of African blackwood and it weights like 45 grams... really heavy for sure! The ebony bridge that is slightly thinner (about 1/8" thinner) weights 10 grams less!

_________________
Cat-gut strings are made from kitten guts, stretched out to near breaking point and then hardened with grue saliva. As a result these give a feeling of Pain and anguish whenever played, and often end up playing themselves backwards as part of satanic rituals.

Typhoon Guitars
http://www.typhoon-guitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 1:07 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 10:34 pm
Posts: 1073
First name: Rob
Last Name: McDougall
City: Cochrane
State: Alberta
My madrose bridges weigh in at about 22 grams average.
Mr Gore recommends as light as possible - as low as 15 grams if possible.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 1:21 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 3820
Location: Taiwan
First name: Tai
Last Name: Fu
City: Taipei
Country: Taiwan
Focus: Repair
Status: Semi-pro
I didn't do much about the high weight mostly because an original Gibson SJ300 (or J200) used a really large bridge that is probably heavier... But given the higher density of African blackwood it seems lower density wood would give lighter bridges and therefore better sound..?

_________________
Cat-gut strings are made from kitten guts, stretched out to near breaking point and then hardened with grue saliva. As a result these give a feeling of Pain and anguish whenever played, and often end up playing themselves backwards as part of satanic rituals.

Typhoon Guitars
http://www.typhoon-guitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 2:48 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:20 am
Posts: 2593
Location: Powell River BC Canada
First name: Danny
Last Name: Vincent
With my standard belly bridge, the one in the photo, I have a hard time getting the weight of Ebony down below 30g. 31 or 32 for Macassar. Depending on the piece, I can get Brazilian down to about 28g. The last guitar I stung up had Paua Ferro for a bridge. It so far has been the lightest belly bridge I have used at 23g. I think that is going to be a very nice sounding guitar. With a Sitka top, it sounded great right out of the hole.

I'm not sure what the lightest rectangle bridge I've made weighed in at. Sometimes in my haste to get them glued on I forget to weigh them.

Attachment:
rsz_1rsz_img_0914.jpg


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 4:24 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:34 am
Posts: 3081
Never weigh them...
Never found the weight of individual parts makes that much difference. But then, I would guess my tops are 10-20 thou thicker than most of you folks tops, use laminated braces, ladder bracing, and get my sound out of tapping and picking woods that are lively, not light. Always felt that the tone was in the wood, not what you take away and leave as shavings on the floor.
Different strokes...


Last edited by Haans on Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:45 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 4:30 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:35 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: United States
First name: Joe
Last Name: Beaver
City: Lake Forest
State: California
Focus: Build
My last bridge was African blackwood. It came in at 41g. (before the saddle slot was cut. I do that on the guitar)
But then it is the heaviest wood commercially available.

I also use:
BRW about 28g
Bois de Rose about 32g
Amazon RW about 37g

I have yet to figure out how to make a 18 - 20g bridge.

_________________
Joe Beaver
Maker of Sawdust


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 4:50 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5586
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Generally been about 20-25 g in EIR, which is all I've used so far in only 6 guitars
Last one was an OLF SJ, as per plan, 21 g before fitting, less pin holes drilled after fitting and some shaving on the guitar, so about 19/20 g.

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:15 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:10 pm
Posts: 2764
First name: Tom
Last Name: West
State: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Joe Beaver wrote:

I have yet to figure out how to make a 18 - 20g bridge.


Must say I'm in the same boat, 25g is about the best for me. Might have to try Trevor Gores method. Have used pau ferro for a couple and it's nice wood to work but what I have must be on the heavy end of its scale.
Tom

_________________
A person who has never made a mistake has never made anything!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:40 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Steel string 15-25 grm. The heavy end is when the owner wants a particular look (e.g. Braz) above other aspects of functionality.

Classical, never more than 15 grm and as low as 10 grm.

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 8:44 pm 
Online
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 7548
First name: Ed
Last Name: Bond
City: Nanaimo
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
28 g average for me, 1x6" rectangle.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:24 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:17 am
Posts: 1292
First name: John
Last Name: Arnold
City: Newport
State: TN
Zip/Postal Code: 37821
Country: USA
Focus: Repair
Status: Professional
Quote:
Have used pau ferro for a couple and it's nice wood to work but what I have must be on the heavy end of its scale.

Pau ferro means 'iron wood'. It can be quite heavy.

_________________
John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:19 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:59 pm
Posts: 3623
First name: Dennis
Last Name: Kincheloe
City: Kansas City
State: MO
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I haven't built enough "normal" guitars to have a good average, but I shoot for around 20g for steel strings, and 15g or less for classicals. 13 string BRW harp guitar bridge came out at 28g, which I think is decent considering the necessary size of it. No ebony for me. I want to try African blackwood sometime though, despite the weight.

The main trick I use to get the weight down is to taper the thickness toward the back end. Only the part in front of the saddle slot really needs to be tall. Everything behind can be a lot thinner and still provide the necessary glue area and plenty of stiffness, especially if you have a bridge plate underneath. Plus if you route the saddle slot first, and then taper from the underside, the saddle slot gets tilted backward a few degrees, which is a good thing.

And don't forget to minimize the weight of the bridge plate as well.



These users thanked the author DennisK for the post: Doug Balzer (Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:23 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 7:02 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:10 pm
Posts: 2764
First name: Tom
Last Name: West
State: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
John Arnold:
I was commenting in re: to Danny V. post where he said his lightest bridge was Pau Ferro. What I have is heavy but I did not know the variation within its weight range.
Tom

_________________
A person who has never made a mistake has never made anything!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:55 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:46 am
Posts: 1247
First name: Beth
Last Name: Mayer
City: Tucson
State: AZ
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Mine have been in the mid twenties, using various Ebonys.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:42 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:20 am
Posts: 2593
Location: Powell River BC Canada
First name: Danny
Last Name: Vincent
Tom West wrote:
John Arnold:
I was commenting in re: to Danny V. post where he said his lightest bridge was Pau Ferro. What I have is heavy but I did not know the variation within its weight range.
Tom

The boards I have, while still pretty dense, are on the lighter side weight wise. I used a Pau Ferro FB on the same guitar and although I didn't weight it you could feel it being light. I like this Wood Database. http://www.wood-database.com/lumber-ide ... pau-ferro/ I think it provides a pretty good benchmark. I'm not sure but I think the 2 density numbers must be the variation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:40 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 3:47 pm
Posts: 1213
Location: Raleigh, NC
First name: Ringo
For me it depends on what I want tonally... for my normal SS I generally go for lots of volume and a fast response with little care for sustain and shoot for about 20-22g. For a slower attack and decay I want upper 20s... the higher weight brings a tone that blooms relatively slowly and has lower volume. Almost as important as bridge weight is damping which is a whole other discussion.

I have a 17g padauk bridge going on my next, which is braced super light and is as lively a box as I've made. I expect it to be a really loud, punchy, in your face kind of instrument.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:19 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5586
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Tom West wrote:
John Arnold:
I w............................................................................................................................................side weight wise. I used a Pau Ferro FB on the same guitar and although I didn't weight it you could feel it being light. I like this Wood Database. http://www.wood-database.com/lumber-ide ... pau-ferro/ I think it provides a pretty good benchmark. I'm not sure but I think the 2 density numbers must be the variation.


It explains elsewhere on the website
Quote:
The first number is the basic specific gravity, based on the botanical standard of ovendry weight and green volume. The second number is meant for woodworkers, and is simply a snapshot of the wood’s specific gravity at 12% MC, (that is, both 12% MC weight and volume).

Full blurb article is here http://www.wood-database.com/wood-articles/specific-gravity/

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.



These users thanked the author Colin North for the post: DannyV (Fri Apr 04, 2014 8:16 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 11:50 am 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:49 pm
Posts: 73
First name: Tom
Last Name: Phillips
City: Arcata
State: CA
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I'm around 31 g with a Honduran belly bridge. I think my last two were 32 and 33 g. Surprising how much material you have to remove to lose a gram or two...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 8:39 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 5:46 am
Posts: 2997
Location: United States
Bridges need to be a little heavier than this ...
Attachment:
image001.jpg


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Jim Watts
http://jameswattsguitars.com



These users thanked the author Jim Watts for the post (total 2): Haans (Fri Apr 04, 2014 7:49 am) • Imbler (Thu Apr 03, 2014 9:18 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: meddlingfool, timtam and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com