Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sun Sep 14, 2025 5:29 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:47 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:28 pm
Posts: 303
First name: Hugh
Last Name: Evans
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Gorilla has done nothing short of a fantastic job marketing their product. Polyurethanes, in my experience, are best suited to special applications. In terms of performance as wood glues they are not far from epoxies, and are exceptionally brittle. They are among the most prone to true adhesive failure, particularly when exposed to shock. CA was most likely excluded because the method in this article applied shear stress (parallel to the glueline.) For most adhesives, shear is the strongest direction and this is also true for wood. However, CA is very weak in shear and strongest in tension. In fact, it is commonly used for sheet metal operations where it is useful to tack a work piece in position quickly and then giving the edge a quick whack with a hammer to separate it. One point definitely worth noting for anyone doing spot repairs with CA is to never use activator spray if it can be avoided. Strength is decreased and the adhesive is more likely to become opaque due to stresses induced by the accelerated reaction. I have personally seen strength losses approaching 50% due to the use of activators.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:57 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 11:25 pm
Posts: 7207
Location: United States
Todd Stock wrote:
FWW's reviews range from OK to just stupid. I realize it's tough to please everyone and almost impossible to please me, but some of this stuff included in the review is meaningless, while other stuff left out is significant...on cleanup alone, HHG wins, as well as regluing existing work...really never even examined by the FWW guys.

Flush.....


ROFLOL...

_________________
"I want to know what kind of pickups Vince Gill uses in his Tele, because if I had those, as good of a player as I am, I'm sure I could make it sound like that.
Only badly."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:21 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:28 pm
Posts: 303
First name: Hugh
Last Name: Evans
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Don't know how I missed Todd's reply.

People are often shocked upon learning that HHG can go toe to toe with any modern PVA any day of the week. In terns of strength, thermal resistance, and exceptional lack of creep it is effectively a perfect wood glue. It is also fully reversible and requires no special preparation for reassembly. For musical instruments, complaining about its lack of water resistance is comical (when I say water I mean direct contact with water, high humidity isn't the same thing.) The only legitimate drawbacks are lengthy preparation time, and handling properties that can make its use difficult or impossible. I have some biochemical tricks up my sleeve that should theoretically prevent degradation of liquid hide glue. About a year and a half ago I succeeded in modifying soy flour to pass Type II water resistance. Would I love to develop enhanced biologically derived adhesives? Absolutely. But I have yet to find an adhesives company willing to deviate from traditional synthetic polymer chemistry... Not to mention I'm not going to give such concepts away.

I am, however, absolutely certain that non-toxic, structural, water-resistant biological adhesives can be produced with current technology. Perhaps some day we'll have our cake and eat it too.

Until then: Don't ever sell HHG short. It's amazing stuff.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:44 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:44 am
Posts: 6262
Location: Virginia
Thanks Hugh for the informative replies.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:32 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:13 am
Posts: 902
Location: Caves Beach, Australia
The use of the brindle joint, without clamping, and then loading the joint in rotation is not a good way to test the shear load.
It would be very difficult to ensure you did not wipe out some glue when assembling.
It would have been better to have lapped two pieces onto a central one with appropriate clamping, and then loaded axially.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com