Todd Stock wrote:
As for hearsay and unqualified conjecture...I'm a degreed aerospace engineer with grad work in composite structures…the kind you glue. I've been a hand tool woodworker since the age of 13, so at 53, I've spent four decades knee-deep in shavings. Not a glue expert, but I think I can offer an informed opinion on the subject. I also think that folks like Mario Proulx, Ian Kirby, Frank Ford, and a host of others both alive and long dead are equally qualified to offer their opinions on the subject. They may differ from mine in detail (Frank likes zapping glue with the microwave; Mario freezes his; Ian dumps his after a day or two of use and boils the pots out), but that does not cause me to consider their experiences or views on the subject as hearsay or in any way unqualified.
I am no aerospace engineer but at 52 I have spent a good deal of my life working wood Todd, quite a bit of it in full time employment throughout my 20's and 30's, 5 and 6 days a week but I don't think that qualifiers for much in relation to the topic at hand. I think you know full well that my comment regarding hearsay was never intended to dist the experiences or opinion of others, rather it was a valid question relating to my being unaware of any science supporting the notion that there is a clear relationship between a determinable loss of bond strength in HHG, and the number of times that a sample had been cycled through the heating process. I questioned that notion simply because I have not found any evidence to support that during my own extended use of the product. To each his own I suppose.
Cheers
Kim