Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Wed Aug 20, 2025 11:37 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 7:59 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 502
First name: joseph
Last Name: sallis
City: newcastle-upon-tyne
State: tyne and wear
Zip/Postal Code: ne46xe
Country: UK
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Sorry if this has been discussed before.
I'm debating with myself if I should pore fill the back and sides BEFORE installing binding and purfling. Possibly after the channel has been routed.
Anyone else do this?
Any reason not to do this?

_________________
We are all in the gutter but some of us are looking at guitars.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 8:16 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:10 pm
Posts: 2764
First name: Tom
Last Name: West
State: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Joe: Not sure why you would want to but don't think its a good idea. You most likely get fill in your rebates resulting in more work or poor gluing and when you scrape the bindings you will most likely pull out or cut through the fill. If you are afraid of coloring light wood you can do things like seal before filling.
Tom

_________________
A person who has never made a mistake has never made anything!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:05 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 502
First name: joseph
Last Name: sallis
City: newcastle-upon-tyne
State: tyne and wear
Zip/Postal Code: ne46xe
Country: UK
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I just thought it might be easier but having read your replies I can see that it's not.
OK, thanks, enough said.
I think I'm going to try the egg white technique, but first those pesky bindings! On with it!
Oh, one more question, is it good practice to seal the binding channel with shellac before gluing on the bindings? I'm using Titebond (or CA, haven't decided yet)?

_________________
We are all in the gutter but some of us are looking at guitars.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:21 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 11:49 am
Posts: 897
Location: Northen Cal.
Titebond, NO
CA YES

_________________
Cut to size.....Beat to fit.....Paint to match.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 10:12 am 
Link Van Cleave wrote:
Titebond, NO
CA YES


My vote would be for Fish glue..

It has a long open time and you won't run the risk of the CA leaking past the linings and causing a mess on the inside of the instrument.

M


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 12:16 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:47 am
Posts: 1244
Location: Montreal, Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Michael Colbert wrote:
Link Van Cleave wrote:
Titebond, NO
CA YES


My vote would be for Fish glue..

It has a long open time and you won't run the risk of the CA leaking past the linings and causing a mess on the inside of the instrument.

M


I believe (I may be wrong) that Link was not saying Titbond is bad for bindings and CA is good. He was answering the question as if it is needed to seal with Shellac prior to gluing the bindings. With Titebond, your must not seal, while you must with CA.

Just thought I'd point this out since it may be read the wrong way.

_________________
Alain Moisan
Former full time builder of Acoustics, Classicals and Flamencos.
(Now building just for fun!)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 1:21 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 502
First name: joseph
Last Name: sallis
City: newcastle-upon-tyne
State: tyne and wear
Zip/Postal Code: ne46xe
Country: UK
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Thanks for the answers.
It's a good thing I asked, I had in my head that you should seal before using Titebond.
I think I'll try fish glue, never used it before, should be interesting.

_________________
We are all in the gutter but some of us are looking at guitars.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 4:19 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 11:49 am
Posts: 897
Location: Northen Cal.
Alain Moisan wrote:
Michael Colbert wrote:
Link Van Cleave wrote:
Titebond, NO
CA YES


My vote would be for Fish glue..

It has a long open time and you won't run the risk of the CA leaking past the linings and causing a mess on the inside of the instrument.

M


I believe (I may be wrong) that Link was not saying Titbond is bad for bindings and CA is good. He was answering the question as if it is needed to seal with Shellac prior to gluing the bindings. With Titebond, your must not seal, while you must with CA.

Just thought I'd point this out since it may be read the wrong way.


Thanks Alan, yes that is what I was saying. I was directly responding to the OP's two part question.
L.

_________________
Cut to size.....Beat to fit.....Paint to match.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com