Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Aug 15, 2025 4:57 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 10:58 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:27 pm
Posts: 716
Location: United States
First name: Dave
Last Name: Livermore
State: Minnesota
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
A while back I posted pics of a top that I just couldnt close thr ring+ mode on.
http://luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10101&t=39676

The lower arms of both x braces just kept getting smaller and smaller to the point where I knew the top was done.

So I went back to the drawing board on it. I scraped all the braces off and started over. I also discovered and refined my understanding of chladni tuning a top along the way.

My theory is this; when tuning a top using chladni patterns, the top reaches its optimum resonance and efficiency when the stiffness of the top is equal both with and across the grain.
When that happens, the ring plus mode will close.

When I originally braced this top, I wanted to use a double x brace. I knew that the ring+ mode would close at the bottom if I removed all material from the other x legs below where the line of intersection with the edge of the lower bout with the main x legs. This was a trick I picked up from Mark Blanchard in a post.
So I tightened the X up to pish that intersection line as low on the body as possible so the other x legs could be as long as possible and offer more structure and stability to the top. It seemed like a good idea at the time.
But what I did was take a piece of cedar that was already stiff along the grain, and reinforce that stiffness with the x brace. There was no possible way that chladni mode was ever going to close.

With that revelation in mind, i re-braced the top.
I think I am on the right track because this is what I found with the first test.
Image

Image

The ring was closed without any tuning. I was shooting for 250hz and that is exactly where the mode was found.

I wasn't real big on all that unbraced real estate below the x braces, but I was reminded by Al Carruth in his video that there isn't much that needs bracing from a strength and structure standpoint down there anyhow, so I am going for it.


Hope my nightmare and lesson helps others on the journey.


Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 12:07 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 1:11 pm
Posts: 2390
Location: Spokane, Washington
First name: Pat
Last Name: Foster
Country: USA
Focus: Build
You're cooking with gas, now, Dave! Sometimes it all just clicks. Looks like this is one of those times!

Pat

_________________
formerly known around here as burbank
_________________

http://www.patfosterguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:41 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 2:44 pm
Posts: 692
Looks good Dave. I'm glad you figured out that top. They can be difficult, and sometimes changing the x angle is what is needed. You surely proved that!

Chuck

_________________
_________________


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Colin North and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com