Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Mon Jul 28, 2025 11:33 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 2:05 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 1:44 pm
Posts: 706
First name: Wendy
Last Name: W
State: Arizona
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Somewhere on the web I saw pictures of a construction sequence where a classical neck with slotted heel had the fingerboard attached and fretted before attaching the soundboard and placing on a solera. I can't figure out where I saw it. Has anyone else seen this, or attempted to build in that sequence?
Wendy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 2:47 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:44 am
Posts: 2186
Location: Newark, DE
First name: Jim
Last Name: Kirby
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I am building one like that, but it is with an elevated fingerboard, so the soundboard ends up being glued to the neck extension during the body assembly. I was following instructions in one of the buildalongs on Mario's site, by Mick Lazar. It's basically a Greg Byers design, but with a tilted soundboard (like a Humphrey) rather than a bent one.

_________________
Jim Kirby
kirby@udel.edu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 4:14 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 1:44 pm
Posts: 706
First name: Wendy
Last Name: W
State: Arizona
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Jim, now that you mention Mick Lazar, that is where I saw the pictures. It is a very interesting build documentation that I have referred to for other parts of the build process. I'm wondering if there is a way to use that assembly sequence for the neck/fingerboard/soundboard for a non-elevated fingerboard? I hope you will post some pictures of your build. Thanks for the reply, Wendy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:59 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:44 am
Posts: 2186
Location: Newark, DE
First name: Jim
Last Name: Kirby
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Wendy,

I suppose that the method could be extended to a more conventional neck geometry, but there is so much work that goes into jigs that it probably wouldn't be enticing to most folks. It may do a better job of controlling neck and top geometry than a regular solera though - I usually have to plane my fretboard a little to get things right even though the solera geometry is nominally correct.

I'll post pics when I get back to that build - I've had all I can handle doing more conventional builds and haven't had the time to make progress on it. I basically have the neck made, the jigs built, and the sides bent, and it's been that way for probably two years.

Attachment:
neck-2.JPG


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Jim Kirby
kirby@udel.edu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:52 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:10 pm
Posts: 2485
Location: Argyle New York
First name: Mike/Mikey/Michael/hey you!
Last Name: Collins
City: Argyle
State: New York
Zip/Postal Code: 12809
Country: U.S.A. /America-yea!!
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I would not use that construction method.
But I'm old hat!
How can you be sure of the neck to top angle?
Plus you'd need to build a special work-board.

I'm not saying it can't work!
If you make a work-board & figure out by trial & error
the problems associated with this type of build
then go for it.

And post your findings please.
Mike

_________________
Mike Collins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 4:07 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:44 am
Posts: 2186
Location: Newark, DE
First name: Jim
Last Name: Kirby
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Mike Collins wrote:
I would not use that construction method.
But I'm old hat!
How can you be sure of the neck to top angle?
Plus you'd need to build a special work-board.

I'm not saying it can't work!
If you make a work-board & figure out by trial & error
the problems associated with this type of build
then go for it.

And post your findings please.
Mike


It is indeed a special workboard and form, details worked out to the nth degree. But I can't evaluate yet as I've never gotten a box together with it yet. LOTS of jig and fixture work.

_________________
Jim Kirby
kirby@udel.edu


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: rbuddy and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com