Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sun Jun 29, 2025 10:43 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: why not oak?
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:28 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 4:49 pm
Posts: 1209
Location: Ukiah, CA
That's a great story, Al. A few years ago I remember going on a tour of the Constitution and they made quite a point of the live oak used in its construction. I'm sure they used local oak too. The live oak was particularly beautiful but I can't imagine using it on a guitar except for maybe a headstock plate.

Quote:
Here's what Wikipedia has to say: The Naval Act of 1794 provided for the construction of four ships carrying forty-four guns each, and two ships carrying thirty-six guns each.[8] Constitution was the third of the forty-four gun frigates to be completed, and was given her name by President George Washington.[9] Her keel was laid down on 1 November 1794 at Edmund Hartt's shipyard in Boston, Massachusetts, under the supervision of Captain Samuel Nicholson and naval constructor George Claghorn.[Note 3] Primary materials used in her construction were white pine, longleaf pine, white oak, and, most importantly, southern live oak, which was cut and milled at Gascoigne Bluff in St. Simons, Georgia. Southern live oak, a particularly dense wood, can weigh up to 75 lb (34 kg) per cubic foot (1,201 kg/m3). Constitution's hull was built 21 inches (530 mm) thick in an era when 18 inches (460 mm) was common. Her vertical hull ribbing was placed 2 in (51 mm) apart instead of the standard 24 in (610 mm). Her length between perpendiculars was 175 ft (53 m), with a 204 ft (62 m) length overall[3] and a width of 45 ft 2 in (13.8 m). In total, 60 acres (24.28 ha) of trees were needed for her construction.[10] Paul Revere forged the copper bolts and breasthooks.[11][12] The copper sheathing installed to prevent shipworm was imported from England.[11][Note 4]


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Ken Franklin
clumsy yet persistent
https://www.kenfranklinukulele.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: why not oak?
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:39 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:27 pm
Posts: 2109
Location: South Carolina
First name: John
Last Name: Cox
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Well, I have a nice wide Live oak board that I am planning to use for backs and sides.

It was air dried out doors in S. Florida.... so I may as well resaw it and check for wood worms.... Those large tracks would add some "Character" wouldn't they...

Thanks

John


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: why not oak?
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:53 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:58 am
Posts: 2774
Location: Tampa, Florida USA
Yeah, I call it the Organic. :)
If you have enough and it's free it would also be good for making jigs and fences for jigs.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ken Lewis and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com