Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Aug 22, 2025 1:53 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 6:42 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:37 pm
Posts: 1744
Location: Virginia, USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Anyone know where I can get a copy of a small parlor plan(12" lower bout max)
? Prefer free if possible, but any you can point me to would be more than I have now.
Thanks.

_________________
Mike

The only thing nescessary for evil to thrive is for good men to do nothing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 7:33 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:37 pm
Posts: 1744
Location: Virginia, USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Todd Stock wrote:
Size 2 and Size 5 plans (aka small concert and 3/4 size) by Scott Antes from several sources.

Thanks, Todd. Searched for them on LMII's site and couldn't find them. Went back and searched under Scott Antes. Came up immediately. Think I'm gonna go for PL29, Parlor/Small Concert, but without the slot head.
appreciated.

_________________
Mike

The only thing nescessary for evil to thrive is for good men to do nothing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 10:43 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:50 am
Posts: 496
First name: Phil
Last Name: Hartline
City: Warrior
State: Alabama
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I'm building two from that plan now. It has a 12-1/4" lower bought. I went with the slot heads because I wanted to, but you could easily substitute a flat head. Also, this plan calls for a wide fingerboard, with a note on dimensions for a more standard width. I'm making mine a custom width.

I'm very satisfied with the plan, I got mine from LMI and thought the cost very reasonable. Also, I called LMI and they have a double acting truss rod the right length for this short neck. I believe it is part number TRSDS, butworth confirming.

I say go for it, and good luck!

_________________
Phil

http://www.oleninstruments.com

"Those who tilt at windmills are only considered insane by those who can't see the dragon."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 9:02 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:37 pm
Posts: 1744
Location: Virginia, USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
My thanks to both of you for the help.
Spyder, yeah I realize that plan is 1/4" over the 12" lower bout I specified, but it's so close that I'm not too worried about it. I'm gonna reduce the depth slightly anyway when I get around to building.Plus, the other plan they had that fit the size reqiurement had a 21.(something. lol) scale length. I'd prefer to keep to a more standard scale. I think this will do quite nicely.
And yeah, anyone who complains about the price of that plan is just being cheap. That's a great price.

_________________
Mike

The only thing nescessary for evil to thrive is for good men to do nothing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 9:52 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 7:57 pm
Posts: 465
City: Quakertown
State: Pa
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
GAL has plans for a Size 1.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 1:14 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:46 pm
Posts: 2174
First name: Freeman
Last Name: Keller
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I built a parlor from the Antes plans and am very happy with it. Two cautions - the plans are drawn as tho you were looking through the top (rather than from the inside) - it is very easy to brace it backwards (ie, lefty). Secondly, the general feeling on this and other forums was that it is over braced - I thinned and scalloped quite a bit (would have to go back to my notes to know how much). Mine came out kind of boxy/bluesy sounding, remarkably loud for such a small box and is now four years old ange getting better.

The picture shows it relative to an OM and a 000

Image

fwiw - it fits a TKL size 0 case perfectly


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 1:24 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:37 pm
Posts: 1744
Location: Virginia, USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Thanks to both of you.
Freeman, that's info I can use. Not sure what size the braces are, but I am planning to use 1/4" braces anyway, so probably lighter than normal. But I'll definitely keep that in mind when I start to build.
I will really only use the plans to help locate the bridgeplate/braces, and to use to make the body form and as a guide when bending. Everything else is subject to "interpretation".

_________________
Mike

The only thing nescessary for evil to thrive is for good men to do nothing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 1:44 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:46 pm
Posts: 2174
First name: Freeman
Last Name: Keller
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Couple of more minor points. I did use the shorter scale lenght - 24.5 I think - which does put the bridge more or less in the center of the bout. Wide flat fretboard (1-3/4), slot head of course. I debated using a pyramid bridge which would have been more period correct, but ended up with a slightly cut down belly bridge - I liked the way it fit the shape of the lower bout. Used style 41 abalone and the headstock inlay is my daughter's tatoo (the guitar was for her). I was more or less patterning it on Joan Baez's 0-42. I was visiting her last week and played it - got to thinking that I really should build one for myself....

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 3:13 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:50 am
Posts: 496
First name: Phil
Last Name: Hartline
City: Warrior
State: Alabama
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Mike,

Just curious, why do you want a lower bout of exactly 12 inches?

_________________
Phil

http://www.oleninstruments.com

"Those who tilt at windmills are only considered insane by those who can't see the dragon."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:08 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:37 pm
Posts: 1744
Location: Virginia, USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I don't need it exactly 12" . But all the small body plans I found were over 13" and usually 15". I'm looking to build a very small parlor because I have some physical issues that can't deal with that big, deep lower bout. I basically had to stop playing acoustic several years ago because even " small" guitars(OOO,L-OO) were just to danged large and caused me too much trouble. I'll be building the guitar thinner than usual as well, to accomodate this. The 12" Lower bout spec was just to narrow down the responses more toward the guitars in the range I'm looking for. The LMII plan is only 1/4" out. I can live with that. And I know it'll be good quality.

_________________
Mike

The only thing nescessary for evil to thrive is for good men to do nothing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 7:13 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 3:21 pm
Posts: 3447
Location: Alexandria MN
I've built 7 from the Antes plans. 1/4" braces, 24.9 scale, and I splayed the X a little more and lengthened the bridge to 6.75" to get the corners over the X. They have been a big hit.

As mentioned, the plans are confusing. My first was an unintentional lefty!
Here are the last three. Two were Lutz/IRW with a BZ bridge and had an amazing sound.

The TKL O case I had was a little loose and Cedar Creek made a custom pattern for me and it squeaks in just right. That's an option if you can't find a standard case you like.

Image

One other thing, the 12 fret short scale neck does not bow as much under tension so if you use a reinforced neck be sure to level under some truss rod tension so you'll get some relief when you string up. Also don't run your carbon bars past the nut slot or you'll hit them when you ramp the string slots.

_________________
It's not what you don't know that hurts you, it's what you do know that's wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 7:21 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:37 pm
Posts: 1744
Location: Virginia, USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Those are beautiful, Terence!
A question. I know that a classical size top will work, but will the sides for a classical work, or will I need steel string sides?

_________________
Mike

The only thing nescessary for evil to thrive is for good men to do nothing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 10:08 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 3:21 pm
Posts: 3447
Location: Alexandria MN
My parlors have the same depth as my OM's, around 4" and 3 1/4". As I recall the side length is at least a couple of inches shorter but you can get that from the plans. If classical sides fall within those measurements they should be fine.

_________________
It's not what you don't know that hurts you, it's what you do know that's wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com