Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sun Aug 03, 2025 8:11 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:48 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 4820
When designing a heel for a butt joint, what tends to be a realistic minimum thickness? The heel I've drawn up is a working draft. Not finalized, but close to what appeals to me aesthetically. I'll likely fine tune the curve (lower left of the drawing) to flow with the body as well as I can.

As it is now, the maximum thickness down the center is 3/4", and the narrowest is about 11/16" (just a hair under 3/4"). My threaded inserts are 3/8" in diameter by 1/2" long. I plan recess them about 1/16" into the heel, which doesn't leave a lot of real estate behind them.

I'd love to hear your thoughts about whether this should be structurally sound, or if I need to make some adjustments.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:07 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 4:49 pm
Posts: 1209
Location: Ukiah, CA
I use butt joints a lot but I do an MT joint for that type of heel. But it might work. You can always grind your inserts down. The thing to do is make a test joint and try to break it. Let us know your results. Whatever you decide put a dowel in the heel so the insert threads don't just tear out the end grain.

_________________
Ken Franklin
clumsy yet persistent
https://www.kenfranklinukulele.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 6:47 am 
Online
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:52 pm
Posts: 3183
First name: Don
Last Name: Parker
City: Charleston
State: West Virginia
Zip/Postal Code: 25314
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I am using a butt joint with no tenon on the two I am building now, and I like it enough to make it my new normal. I have a thicker and rounder heel than you do; about twice as thick at the top of the curve. I did it that way because I worry about all of that stress at a spot with a short grain orientation. Experiment with a mock-up, obviously, and see how hard or easy it is to break the heel using the leverage of the neck. I think the dowel is good for more than just giving the inserts more to grab; I think it strengthens the heel and provides some protection against a break there.

If you add a tenon, you can get away with a lot less heel. If you go without a tenon, I worry about having as thin a heel as you want to use. No real life bad breaks to report; just concern.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 9:05 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:03 am
Posts: 1737
Location: Litchfield MI
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Looks precarious to me -- instead of inserts I'd implant a brass rod the length of the heel, bore the vertical hole so the circumference is proud of the heel end. Grind a flat on the protrusion (epoxy the rod in place) drill and tap to accommodate fasteners. McPherson does something similar albeit much more complex.

_________________
Ken Cierp

http://www.kennethmichaelguitars.com/


Last edited by kencierp on Sat Sep 24, 2016 3:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 10:05 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:20 am
Posts: 2593
Location: Powell River BC Canada
First name: Danny
Last Name: Vincent
That looks to me to have the potential for problems simply due to the lack of material. That heel looks like a good candidate for a M & T. But then that's all I have used and all the heels I have done have been more traditional. If you do go with a butt some sort of X grain reinforcement would be a good idea.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 5:52 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 1:32 pm
Posts: 3470
First name: Alex
Last Name: Kleon
City: Whitby
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: L1N8X2
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
This is the only picture that I took of the butt joint that I did. Depth is 15/16" at the heel cap. I drilled a 1/2" vertical hole in the heel block, glued in a piece of dowel, and then drilled an off centre vertical hole through the dowel for the two barrel nuts. There's a spacer dowel between the two barrels for alignment. There's about 3/16" of dowel for the barrels to bear against.
Image

Hopefully my narrative is understandable. A hand drawing might be better.

Alex


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

_________________
"Indecision is the key to flexibility" .... Bumper sticker


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 10:28 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 4820
Alex, thanks. I think I understand. re you describing a way that you used barrel nuts vertically rather than horizontally?

Thanks for the feedback, everyone. Much appreciated. [:Y:] Ken, Trevor advises on a similar setup in Build.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 10:36 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 1:32 pm
Posts: 3470
First name: Alex
Last Name: Kleon
City: Whitby
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: L1N8X2
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
James Orr wrote:
Alex, thanks. I think I understand. re you describing a way that you used barrel nuts vertically rather than horizontally?

Thanks for the feedback, everyone. Much appreciated. [:Y:] Ken, Trevor advises on a similar setup in Build.


Correct, James. Seems to work well, so far.

Alex

_________________
"Indecision is the key to flexibility" .... Bumper sticker


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 4:53 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 9:37 am
Posts: 697
First name: Murray
Last Name: MacLeod
City: Edinburgh
Country: UK
When I first came across the tapped brass vertical dowel process it made a whole lot of sense, but I have since been thinking that an aluminum dowel would serve the same purpose, and would also weigh significantly less than brass.

Any reason not to use aluminum here?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 7:15 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:33 am
Posts: 1900
First name: Willard
Last Name: Guthrie
City: Cumberland
State: Maryland 21502
Zip/Postal Code: 21502
Country: United State
Focus: Repair
Status: Semi-pro
When we use butted neck joints (we have three under construction which use that design and one student guitar), we use a 1/2" hardwood dowel run vertically on the center line from heel to underside of fretboard, and the Italian-made Hillman 1/4-20 threaded inserts - the 1/2" lowest in the neck and a deeper 3/4" for the upper insert. The Hillman inserts require a 5/16" pilot, versus the 3/8" for other steel inserts, so there is more beef. The Hillman part number for the smaller diameter Italian-made inserts is 57109-G.

I discussed the topic of minimal heel neck designs in the shop yesterday and the concerns were that - while the inserts could likely be made to work with some cross-grain reinforcement, the tight turn at the heel/neck shaft transition had the potential to be a significant stress riser, and without a tenon to transfer the bending loads to , there is not much structure there to keep things together.

We've had a number of Somogyi guitars in over the past year, which have similar heel contours, but that builder uses a tenon design that is locked into the neck block with two dowels so that the loads at the heel are transferred to the tenon and then into the neck. While there are some doubt in the minds of the builders here as to just how difficult a neck reset would be with this design, there is agreement that the joint allows a minimalist/vestigial heel design to work well.

One of the local builders has come up with a full bolt-on heel-less design for his acoustics (the bolts run from back to front, versus the face-to-heel fasteners used on something like a Taylor Baby. The logical progression from long, structurally beefy heels like the Breedlove and Taylor designs, through Martin's moderate heel profiles, and then to more extreme reductionist/vestigial heel designs like Somogyi's suggests doing away with the heel entirely in favor of a bolt-up design.

The final concern noted was heel geometry after a neck reset or two. While the face of the insert could be left proud of the face and the body hole chamfered, with relief for fitting and removal of material for the reset, that short heel gets even shorter...it may be worth seeing what 1/8" of material off the heel might leave after 2-3 resets.

_________________
A constellation only takes shape when one maps the whole.
- Beth Brower



These users thanked the author Woodie G for the post: James Orr (Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:36 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:01 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:20 am
Posts: 5968
Another way to visually reduce the size of the heel is to recess it into the body as was done on many old romantic guitars. For the Gibson style heel this is relatively easy to do, and I have done it for "Spanish" style heels also. It also allows you to adjust the angle of the neck using shims or removing material (as is usual for resets). Aside from cutting a tight neck pocket no special considerations are necessary for the construction. Cracked heels are common on many conventionally built dovetail necks. As others have mentioned the grain orientation makes this a weak point


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 6:25 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 4820
That's a lot to think about, Woodie. Thank you! I have the Hillman inserts in my Amazon cart to hold them for now.

It seems like some reinforcement is necessary no matter what. Aluminum does sound like a good idea if I go that route as opposed to hardwood. If I do that, I wonder how much material is recommended I should leave between the anchor and the face of the heel. 1/8"

Another option I thought of this morning was to do the hardwood down down the center and carbon fiber dowels flanking its sides.

I prefer the butt joint at this point. I can do the mortis and tenon, but I'm not setup for it. I'd need to develop some templates.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:50 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 9:37 am
Posts: 697
First name: Murray
Last Name: MacLeod
City: Edinburgh
Country: UK
James Orr wrote:
It seems like some reinforcement is necessary no matter what. Aluminum does sound like a good idea if I go that route as opposed to hardwood.


If you were to use an aluminum dowel, the inserts would be superfluous ... the bolts will go straight into tapped holes in the aluminum dowel, bypassing the need for any inserts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:06 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 4820
murrmac wrote:
James Orr wrote:
It seems like some reinforcement is necessary no matter what. Aluminum does sound like a good idea if I go that route as opposed to hardwood.


If you were to use an aluminum dowel, the inserts would be superfluous ... the bolts will go straight into tapped holes in the aluminum dowel, bypassing the need for any inserts.


Yep. We're on the same page.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:38 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:17 pm
Posts: 1179
City: Escondido
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 92029
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
murrmac wrote:
James Orr wrote:
It seems like some reinforcement is necessary no matter what. Aluminum does sound like a good idea if I go that route as opposed to hardwood.


If you were to use an aluminum dowel, the inserts would be superfluous ... the bolts will go straight into tapped holes in the aluminum dowel, bypassing the need for any inserts.



Brilliant!

Have a repair I was going to use walnut dowel on. Hadn't sourced the dowel yet, but have plenty of aluminum 1/2" dowels. Aluminum it is then!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:18 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5585
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Square section will be better than round as the bolt tension will tend to split the wood with it vertical in the heel.
Likewise a tenon as suggested would be a must rather than a butt joint, which will leave little wood between the face and the aluminium bar.
I use this joint type for all my builds now (from Trevor Gore's Book) but with a 3/8" brass bar, so far anyway.

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.


Last edited by Colin North on Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:18 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:50 pm
Posts: 2260
Location: Seattle WA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Hmmm..... all this talk of aluminum dowels got me thinking. It would actually serve two purposes. It would be a little extra work to tap. However, I wonder if those aluminum threads would hold as well as Steel? I guess as long as they hold better than the wood! Lol

_________________
Pat


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:54 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 1:32 pm
Posts: 3470
First name: Alex
Last Name: Kleon
City: Whitby
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: L1N8X2
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
pat macaluso wrote:
Hmmm..... all this talk of aluminum dowels got me thinking. It would actually serve two purposes. It would be a little extra work to tap. However, I wonder if those aluminum threads would hold as well as Steel? I guess as long as they hold better than the wood! Lol


I like the idea of tapping aluminum rod instead of two barrel bolts that I used. Unless you tighten the bolts to wood crushing tension, the aluminum threads should work quite nicely! Love this Forum! [:Y:]

Alex

_________________
"Indecision is the key to flexibility" .... Bumper sticker


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 4:42 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:13 am
Posts: 902
Location: Caves Beach, Australia
IMHO that heel thickness for a butt joint is inadequate, even with a dowel or rod though it.
Where you see minimal heel thicknesses like that is on some archtops, but they have the extra strength from a 5/8" dovetail tenon on the inside, and heel cracks are still common.
It's not just the string tension, it's the accidental knock on the headstock.....



These users thanked the author Jeff Highland for the post: James Orr (Mon Sep 26, 2016 7:06 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 7:10 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 4820
This has been a great discussion. [:Y:] Thanks everybody.

I've added an 1/8" to the neck-body joint side of the heel, everything else remaining the same. If I do the inserts as opposed to tapped rod, they'll obviously come forward that much as well.

The heel is now 13/16" where it transitions to the neck shaft, and 7/8" at the bottom. Do you think that's thick enough, or would it be best to enter mortis land? I'm hoping to avoid the mortis/tenon simply because the butt is so elegantly simple.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 8:53 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:20 am
Posts: 5968
The extra width of the semi- Gibson style heel you have drawn out should give a bit more strength than a Spanish style heel as Martin uses, so my guess would be that at 13/16 ths you may be O.K. But that's just a guess.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:09 pm 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:59 pm
Posts: 54
First name: Jonny
Last Name: Fifield
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Woodie G wrote:
When we use butted neck joints (we have three under construction which use that design and one student guitar), we use a 1/2" hardwood dowel run vertically on the center line from heel to underside of fretboard, and the Italian-made Hillman 1/4-20 threaded inserts - the 1/2" lowest in the neck and a deeper 3/4" for the upper insert. The Hillman inserts require a 5/16" pilot, versus the 3/8" for other steel inserts, so there is more beef. The Hillman part number for the smaller diameter Italian-made inserts is 57109-G.



Any link for these?

Jonny

_________________
"Practice enough till the results aren't hopes but expectations" forum member Peter Havriluk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:44 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 4820
Jonny wrote:

Any link for these?

Jonny


Here they are on Amazon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 4:40 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 9:37 am
Posts: 697
First name: Murray
Last Name: MacLeod
City: Edinburgh
Country: UK
Colin North wrote:
Square section will be better than round as the bolt tension will tend to split the wood with it vertical in the heel.


Hi Colin, I see where you're coming from, but if the hole is made a nice sliding fit, and the rod well glued in with epoxy, wouldn't that negate any wedging effect ?

The square section would require a laminated neck, as well, would it not? The round dowel could be fitted into a one piece neck.

( I feel guilty about taking issue with Colin, as his beautiful guitars were the first I ever saw using this mode of neck attachment ...)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 5:36 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5585
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
murrmac wrote:
Colin North wrote:
Square section will be better than round as the bolt tension will tend to split the wood with it vertical in the heel.


Hi Colin, I see where you're coming from, but if the hole is made a nice sliding fit, and the rod well glued in with epoxy, wouldn't that negate any wedging effect ?

The square section would require a laminated neck, as well, would it not? The round dowel could be fitted into a one piece neck.

( I feel guilty about taking issue with Colin, as his beautiful guitars were the first I ever saw using this mode of neck attachment ...)

No worries and thank you.
Yes, that method would minimise wedging effect, but I wouldn't like to service it if the thread did strip -
Square section does not require laminated neck, just a tenon as I mentioned - with brass rod you cannot tighten it enough by hand to strip thread or pull though the wood (18mm wide tenon, 16 mm long)
Trevor Gore said this, and I've verified it, (as someone known to be very heavy handed) - one piece mahogany neck, normal allen key.

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chris Ensor, doncaparker and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com