Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Thu Aug 14, 2025 9:17 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:50 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:39 pm
Posts: 149
First name: Anthony
Last Name: Eaton
City: Lamoine
State: ME
Zip/Postal Code: 04605
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Trevor Gore wrote:
AnthonyE wrote:
I might agree with you about HSS not being more difficult to sharpen but only because you are set up DMT stones to begin with.

Sure. I went "round the houses" years ago trying to get an efficient sharpening system. I tried all the usual suspects, oil stones used with either oil or water, waterstones used with either oil or water, ceramic stones etc. etc. Everything else other than diamonds meant significant stone maintenance of one sort or another which took time and while the edges I was getting were fine the stone maintenance was a killer. I shelled out for two DMTs (blue and green) 10 or so years ago and all the issues disappeared. They sharpen any alloy you can throw at them to a fine edge in just a few strokes, stay flat and will probably outlast me. One of the best tool investments I made. I wish they'd have put a different stagger pattern on the holes though....


So do u use your diamond stones as a finishing stone? I have never been impressed by the finished edge off any diamonds no matter how fine. But Im a stone geek too. I do love my diamonds too though just not for finishing up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 10:11 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
AnthonyE wrote:
So do u use your diamond stones as a finishing stone?

Yes, I finish up straight off the green "stone". It doesn't give a total mirror finish final bevel, but it's pretty shiny. I taper off the pressure over the last few strokes and that seems to do the trick. I've done the mirror finish thing and found no great advantage to it. Years ago, when I was building boats, straight off a two sided India oil stone seemed plenty good enough, but that seems rough as, now!

The best overall improvement in edge life I got was when I moved from honing a typical bevel down plane iron at 30 degrees to 35 degrees. I should try 40 degrees and see if there's still enough clearance angle!

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:00 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:59 pm
Posts: 3625
First name: Dennis
Last Name: Kincheloe
City: Kansas City
State: MO
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Trevor Gore wrote:
AnthonyE wrote:
So do u use your diamond stones as a finishing stone?

Yes, I finish up straight off the green "stone". It doesn't give a total mirror finish final bevel, but it's pretty shiny.

Huh, I bought one of the extra-extra fine stones, and even that's still a pretty rough surface. Maybe I just need to break it in more? I'll probably just sell it though, since I don't use it much.

I use an extra-extra coarse dia-sharp for flattening the back of new blades, and quickly renewing the primary bevel after my secondary bevel starts getting too big. One of the best tools I've ever bought. Makes a great sanding block for wood, too :) Then extra fine (green) to smooth out the rough scratch marks, then do the secondary bevel and back polishing on the diamond lapping films from Lee Valley. Pretty quick route to a mirror shine, although I can still see some very fine scratch marks in it. I want to try an 8000x waterstone sometime and see if it's any smoother and/or faster. The XXC diamond stone should make quick work of flattening it when it gets worn.

Sometimes I do a round on the XXF stone for the backs of blades before going to the lapping film, but it's not really necessary.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 3:57 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
DennisK wrote:
Huh, I bought one of the extra-extra fine stones, and even that's still a pretty rough surface. Maybe I just need to break it in more?

Certainly my green "stone" is nowhere near as aggressive as it was when new. It settled down after maybe 6 months and doesn't seem to have changed a whole lot since. It's still pretty fast, though.
DennisK wrote:
I want to try an 8000x waterstone sometime and see if it's any smoother and/or faster.

I have a 8000 water stone. You can get the mirror shine alright, but it doesn't seem to do that much for performance.

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:52 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:01 pm
Posts: 1887
Location: UK
I used an 8,000 waterstone for the last 10 years or so. Previous to that I used Oil stones with a fine Arkansas and strop. I've now gone back to the Oil stones. The waterstone certainly worked but the speed at which they dish can get a bit tiring.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 6:00 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5587
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
DennisK wrote:
Huh, I bought one of the extra-extra fine stones, and even that's still a pretty rough surface. Maybe I just need to break it in more?

I have been using the XXF DMT for final honing for 3/4 years now, and, as DMT say, it takes time and use to wear in.
It doesn't seem to go to an absolute mirror finish (slight scratches visible), but easily good enough for sub-thou shavings, cuts real quick, no flattening required, and economical in the long run.
I will admit to hastened the initial break-in by lapping a SS block lightly over the DMT for 5/10 minutes.
Wouldn't be without it.

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 6:14 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:21 am
Posts: 149
Location: Wales U.K.
First name: Anthony
Last Name: Lee
Country: Wales U.K.
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Why not use the Scary Sharp System? Just a piece of plate glass, or something equally hard and flat, and some abrasives sheets. No stone flattening and it is cheap.
http://www.workshopheaven.com/library/W ... ctions.pdf


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 7:12 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:01 pm
Posts: 1887
Location: UK
Scary sharp is OK but in the long run it starts to get expensive in comparison to other methods. My Arkansas stone is near 35 years old and I'll probably get another 100 years out of it. :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 7:18 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Michael.N. wrote:
I used an 8,000 waterstone for the last 10 years or so. Previous to that I used Oil stones with a fine Arkansas and strop. I've now gone back to the Oil stones. The waterstone certainly worked but the speed at which they dish can get a bit tiring.

Yep. Got a fine Arkansas, too. Gives a finish and performance very similar to what I get off the green DMT, but the DMT is a good bit faster. Never tried scary sharp. Always seemed like too much messing around. Probably means I should get better organised! :lol:

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 8:38 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:44 pm
Posts: 1225
Location: Andersonville
State: Tennessee
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Trevor Gore wrote:
DennisK wrote:
I have a 8000 water stone. You can get the mirror shine alright, but it doesn't seem to do that much for performance.


Hmmm....... I have a 600/red & 1200/green DMT for the initial flattening/hone. Then go to my Norton water stones, 1000, 4000, & 8000.

As long as I'm careful not to get a nick in the edge about two minutes on the 8000 and your off to the races, (needs a good stropping) Its a royal PITA to get your initial flattening and honing, but relatively easy to maintain a great edge. My dad has been a sharp tool fiend, for years and has every kind of Arkansas oil stone made and he has gone to the water stones for chisels and planes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:59 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 1:32 pm
Posts: 3470
First name: Alex
Last Name: Kleon
City: Whitby
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: L1N8X2
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
This has been a timely thread for me, and it has given me lots to think about. My sharpening skills are middling at best - I can do an OK job on chisels, but I need to get a much better edge on my plane irons. I've signed-up for a Lee Valley sharpening class next month, so I'm hoping that it will be a good first step in the right direction.

Alex

_________________
"Indecision is the key to flexibility" .... Bumper sticker


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 11:42 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:19 pm
Posts: 78
First name: Aaron
City: Mustang
State: OK
Country: USA
Alex Kleon wrote:
This has been a timely thread for me, and it has given me lots to think about. My sharpening skills are middling at best - I can do an OK job on chisels, but I need to get a much better edge on my plane irons. I've signed-up for a Lee Valley sharpening class next month, so I'm hoping that it will be a good first step in the right direction.

Alex


^^^^^ This. I can get a knife or straight razor to shave very comfortably with; I can get a chisel to be servicable, but my plane iron sharpening is pretty dismal. I have water stones for straights and use them for chisels and plane irons as well. I need to find a class or get some hands-on training!

_________________
"Never give in. Never give in. Never, never, never, never--in nothing, great or small, large or petty--never give in, except to convictions of honor and good sense. Never yield to force. Never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy." - Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:29 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 4820
I'd been using Todd's system with pretty good results consistently for about four years.



But a few weeks ago, my wife and I went to a coffee shop for a few hours during spring break. While she annihilated The Hunger Games, I flipped through Somogyi's, Making the Responsive Guitar. The Double Bevel Sharpening system he recommends in the first or second chapter really intrigued me. After watching Brian's video on it, I was even more interested. It looked like it would help me solve the issue of lapping the back of the blades, which for whatever reason, never quite worked out for me. There was always a scratch or two I couldn't get rid of.



So I've just changed over to this system. Too soon to really comment on it yet, but I like it so far. Speed's about the same. Setup area is obviously a little larger. I feel like the larger honing guide might distribute my pressure a little more evenly across the blade.

And I'm sold on using the DMT's for the initial grits. I have extra extra course (125 grit) for changing bevels, course (325 grit) and extra fine (1200 grit) for the initial hone, and polish at 8000 with a whetstone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 4:49 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 4820
Just took a sub-thousandth shaving for the first time . . . ever. Very cool! The feel of the surface is unbelievable.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 6:24 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:39 pm
Posts: 149
First name: Anthony
Last Name: Eaton
City: Lamoine
State: ME
Zip/Postal Code: 04605
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Wow, this thread really took off when we started talking about sharpening. IMO this is the biggest challenge for some when it comes to sharpening, too many different methods, sharpening mediums, and opinions for beginners to really get a solid edge confidently. The most important advise I can give about sharpening is find a system, learn it, and stick with it for a while. Before giving up on any system I highly reccomend really putting it to use. They all work, some more efficient than others but still can produce an edge capable of fine woodworking.

Now on to my opinions on media and methods. My sharpening right now is designed around efficiency. I want to woodwork not grind tool steel over and over. With that said, I'm actually a bit of a stone (mostly waterstones) geek. But my method for efficiency right now is grind a primary bevel on a 6" high speed bench grinder. Increase to a secondary micro-bevel with a cheap eclipse style honing guide on Sigma Ceramic waterstones. I use a jig with blocks of wood set at certain distances to create a few different angles for my micro bevel. I register the blade and honing guide on the jig to get the right projection for the angle I want. The smaller the secondary bevel is the quicker the sharpening session. Mostly I use a 1000 grit and 16000 Sigma waterstone. Once the secondary gets a little larger I will go with 1000-6000-16000. My most popular diamond stone in my shop is the DMT X-coarse 10 inch and only touches waterstones to flatten them. I use the waterstones as splash and go, no soaking even though they do get a little nicer to use with a short soak. But they are not stones you just leave in the water. They really are no messier than Diamond stones or any other method and I just can't buy that excuse as a reason not to use the new breed of waterstones. They cut fast and produce an edge like I can't get off of any other media. But then again I don't enjoy using them as much as I do some of my natural waterstones and Arkansas oil stones from Dan's Whetstones. I have some Japanese blades that don't touch wood until it is finished up on a Natural Nakayama stone.

Opinions aside, select a method and run with it and then decide if you want to look elsewhere. But give the original method some time to learn its quirks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:36 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Here's a little story, more about blade quality rather than sharpening, but it surprised me, nonetheless.

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 9:43 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:39 pm
Posts: 149
First name: Anthony
Last Name: Eaton
City: Lamoine
State: ME
Zip/Postal Code: 04605
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
That is impressive Trevor. I have also used my planes for aluminum and some brass and they work very well on it. As long as I remember to use my A2 blades on these materials it usually causes very little wear. I have yet to try out Veritas' new PMV11 on any materials as demanding. I have been impressed with the PMV11 in hardwoods though. I use one of their PMV11 blades in my LA Jack for shooting end grain and sharpen this blade about a 1/3 as much as the A2 blade. I also am able to get a slightly sharper edge on the PMV11.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 2:41 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:40 pm
Posts: 505
First name: David
Last Name: Malicky
City: San Diego
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 92111
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I was surprised to hear only ~20% improvement for HSS over A2. You probably know about these tests... http://www3.telus.net/BrentBeach/Sharpen/bladetest.html
which found M2 was about 2x better than A2 for wear. Any idea why the difference? Maybe the 3M Microfinishing abrasives are needed to put an ideal edge on HSS?

_________________
David Malicky


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 6:07 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:39 pm
Posts: 149
First name: Anthony
Last Name: Eaton
City: Lamoine
State: ME
Zip/Postal Code: 04605
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
David Malicky wrote:
I was surprised to hear only ~20% improvement for HSS over A2. You probably know about these tests... http://www3.telus.net/BrentBeach/Sharpen/bladetest.html
which found M2 was about 2x better than A2 for wear. Any idea why the difference? Maybe the 3M Microfinishing abrasives are needed to put an ideal edge on HSS?


The site you posted was what helped me get my edges to the level they reach today. An excellent site and is where I learned about Tsunesaburo Stanley replacement blades and their Japanese planes in general. My woodworking hasn't been the same since discovering this site. For anyone interested in learning about different blades and an effective sharpening method.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 6:38 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
David Malicky wrote:
I was surprised to hear only ~20% improvement for HSS over A2....

I'd hardly say my testing was rigorous in this case, just an impression. Both alloys do a good job, significantly better than stock Stanley/Bailey blades.

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Ken Lewis and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com