Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Thu Sep 18, 2025 7:55 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Neck Angle question
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:51 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:12 am
Posts: 151
First name: robin
Last Name: courtenay
City: andover
State: hants
Country: uk
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Ok got my neck finished fretboard on and fretted ,when i check with straightedge it just grazes top of bridge which is 3/8 inch. Is this in the ball park? Thanks Rob.



These users thanked the author roby for the post (total 2): stumblin (Thu Sep 18, 2025 4:33 am) • Michaeldc (Tue Sep 16, 2025 12:35 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Neck Angle question
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 10:24 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5592
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
[:Y:]

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Neck Angle question
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 11:21 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 7558
First name: Ed
Last Name: Bond
City: Nanaimo
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Perfect, well done!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Neck Angle question
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 4:08 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 10:11 am
Posts: 2231
It will be probably be alright, but I shoot for at least a 1/16" above because the top will rise a little. also it gives more saddle above the bridge for future settling in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Neck Angle question
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2025 4:11 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:33 am
Posts: 1913
First name: Willard
Last Name: Guthrie
City: Cumberland
State: Maryland 21502
Zip/Postal Code: 21502
Country: United State
Focus: Repair
Status: Semi-pro
Interesting question. Assuming you wish to get something close to 1/2" final string height over the top at the bridge on a new/never strung traditionally constructed flattop guitar, I would lean towards Mr. Goodman's suggestion. On a reset of an older instrument, I would tend toward agreement with Mr. North's 'thumbs up' response. Is this new construction or a reset?

Why this matters:

A new flattop guitar will 'settle' over the first few months, with much of that body distortion or apparent 'top rise' occurring within a week or so after stringing up. A lightly constructed instrument might see as much as .060" apparent rise in the top (really an aggregate of back, side, and top distortion due to loading), while something built to the approach Guild took on much of their Westerly 6 string production might see closer to .030 inch change. This is the basis upon which I feel Mr. Goodman's response reflects what you may see if your instrument is in fact new construction.

For an existing instrument, we usually have the advantage of knowing something about how much change we might see in string height above the top under load with measurement both under load and unloaded. Most existing instruments have distorted such that - even with load removed - much of that top rise/distortion is already locked in place. If Mr. Goodman's suggestion on new construction neck geometry is IMO inappropriately applied to a reset on an older guitar, I believe most repair people would anticipate an over-set.

Further, resets must deal with the guitar as it is versus how it might have left the shop or factory decades earlier, to include bridge thicknesses below or above what might be considered optimal as well as overall construction (e.g., 00-21NY versus a 1970's D-28). Further geometry adjustment might be required to avoid a very tall saddle on a thin bridge (with possible structural failure of the saddle slot) or deliver a guitar back to the customer with a very weak reset and minimal benefit to volume, note-to-note separation, projection, and change in saddle height.

_________________
A constellation only takes shape when one maps the whole.
- Beth Brower



These users thanked the author Woodie G for the post: stumblin (Thu Sep 18, 2025 4:34 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cal Maier and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com